Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants owner unimpressed with "mediocre" free agent class


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

New York Post

“There were obviously some star players out there, but for the most part I thought it was a mediocre free-agent class,’’ Giants co-owner John Mara told reporters Thursday at the PAL’s William J. Duncan Center in Manhattan.

.

“And I think a lot of guys got paid more money than maybe they would have in other years because there was a lot of cap room out there. I think the guys who we got will help us, but we still have a long way to go.”

Agree or disagree?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long before FA, I was unimpressed. A few times I stated, the cuts will have far more impact than the group of soon to be FAs. If the lions done a better job of planning, suh would have never been a FA. I knew the good/great FAs would get tagged or resign before the start. It happens each year, a monkey could see it coming.

If not for chip doing some of dumbest moves in nfl history, the FA period would have been a huge dud.

Sad part is I already looked at next years FA class, you know when the panthers have around 60+/- million in space. Same problem the 10-15 guys you'd like to spend that money on will be tagged or resign, just like this year and years before. There's about 4 good LTs set to hit(or not) the market and a couple WRs too........(pointless) panthers should just take that space and use it on cam. Have his cap number be like 40 million for just that one year. Hell same for luke, his should be 20 million for 2016.

I'm still holding to hope that more juicy cuts will happen, even right after the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be honest, do any of us really have any clue how good or bad free agents are? I have a buddy that is a NFL scout and laughs all the time when us commoners try and break down a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take 3 off of that list. To me it was just Suh, Revis, Hardy.

Perhaps, but I always thought that Maclin was underrated here. I always thought that he was the best receiver in free agency. When you are still young and put up more than 1300 yards in a season (w/ Sanchez and Foles, no less) you are bound to get paid. The thing is, people aren't really looking at the guaranteed money which was probably fair market value for Maclin and Cobb. The price for receivers is increasing. But give me a 1300 yard receiver basically just entering his prime any day. Of course Alex Smith will probably kill some of that value with his noodle arm, but that's KC's problem.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be honest, do any of us really have any clue how good or bad free agents are? I have a buddy that is a NFL scout and laughs all the time when us commoners try and break down a player.

To be honest, his opinion probably isn't any more valid than ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...