Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This whole drafting the best player available talk around here is ridiculous


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

So if a Mariota is available should we draft him? What about another DT?

Some of you are taking this whole BPA thing out of context.

The last two first rounds we drafted for need. Cam would have never been a panther by some your guys logic.

We are not in the panthers war room during the draft so who are we to say this guy is the BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if a Mariota is available should we draft him? What about another DT?

Some of you are taking this whole BPA thing out of context.

The last two first rounds we drafted for need. Cam would have never been a panther by some your guys logic.

We are not in the panthers war room during the draft so who are we to say this guy is the BPA.

 

Da fuq are you talking about? Cam was most definitely the BPA.  I jest, but he was, and still is of that draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That hardest part about the Huddle being so awesome and popular is that every year we have the same arguments about the same poo because people come on that weren't here for the same exact argument last year.

I think it was me and Proudiddy or Growl that had a pretty heated discussion about this for about 25+ pages last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...