Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This whole drafting the best player available talk around here is ridiculous


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

It's best player available within reason. On defense I think we'd take the best player available regardless off his position since most defense guys rotate and can contribute on special teams. Obviously we wouldn't take a QB since he'd never touch the field  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and OP, I wish I could be there to watch your head explode if we draft a DT

in the first 2 rounds.  We like to rotate 4, and 2 of our 4 are over 30.  What's more,

Star and KK 's contracts come up for renewal the same year, and we may not

be able to afford both after signing Cam, Luke and Norman. 

 

There is a good chance the BPA in round one or two will be a DT and Getty will probably

take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I genuinely believe that are recent picks filled a need by coincidence, not need.

Gettleman was glowing when talking about Benjamin. Can't coach 6'5" 240 blah blah.

He wanted that guy and didn't delay when he was still on the board at our pick, regardless of a need at WR.

If you would have polled draft experts last year as to what our biggest need was, the universal answer would have been left tackle.

By the time our pick came up, all of the tackles worth taking in the first round we're already gone.

If we didn't follow a BPA philosophy, we would have taken the best remaining tackle anyway, even though it would have meant using our first round pick on a lesser talent.

So basically, we'd have passed over Kelvin Benjamin for Morgan Moses or Cyrus Kouandijo.

That is why you draft BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DG wasn't GM when Cam was drafted.

DG has made it abundantly clear throughout his GMing that the best player on the board is who his team is drafting.

Your thread kinda sucks.

BPA is coach speak...nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither Gurley or any corner taken would contribute to extent of a WR or OT. Those guys would be fighting to get snaps

 

To the chagrin of many, Gurley may just be G-man's BPA at 25, if he's there.  Pre-injury, Gurley was widely considered a top 10 pick. Even post-injury, he is still widely considered to be in play for the first round.  That should tell you something.  All of these people aren't saying that Gurley is a first round graded talent for nothing. No one has talked about an RB like Gurley for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if a Mariota is available should we draft him? What about another DT?

Some of you are taking this whole BPA thing out of context.

The last two first rounds we drafted for need. Cam would have never been a panther by some your guys logic.

We are not in the panthers war room during the draft so who are we to say this guy is the BPA.

You are looking at it wrong. It is not your BPA or the media BPA its gettleman BPA.

Just because the media ranks a player high doesn't mean the panthers do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you would have polled draft experts last year as to what our biggest need was, the universal answer would have been left tackle.

By the time our pick came up, all of the tackles worth taking in the first round we're already gone.

If we didn't follow a BPA philosophy, we would have taken the best remaining tackle anyway, even though it would have meant using our first round pick on a lesser talent.

So basically, we'd have passed over Kelvin Benjamin for Morgan Moses or Cyrus Kouandijo.

That is why you draft BPA.

WR was a HUGE need. Huge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...