Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

'Below average' is plenty good for Panthers

SCP

By SCP,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
Posted

http://m.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/queen_city_agenda/2015/04/below-average-is-plenty-good-for-carolina-panthers.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+charlotte_blog_queencity+%28Charlotte+Queen+City+Agenda%29&utm_term=%23cltcc+&r=full

"The Panthers and two other NFC South teams, Atlanta and Tampa Bay, are below average. Chipps told me Carolina is in that category because of its small home market. The fourth NFC South franchise, New Orleans, was in the average category. In 2013, all four NFC South clubs were in classified as below average in sponsor sales by IEG. Atlanta seems likely to make a jump in 2017 when it opens a new stadium. The Falcons also should benefit from playing in by far the largest metro area of any of the NFC South teams."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozarden Newbie

Bozarden

Posted
Posted

How can there be only 14 teams below average in a 32 team league? Lol

 

The NFL earned 1.15 billion dollars in sponsorships. That divided by 32 is roughly 36 million dollars. Every team that earns less than this is below average and that is apparently 14 teams.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
updownsigma Rookie

updownsigma

Posted
Posted

The NFL earned 1.15 billion dollars in sponsorships. That divided by 32 is roughly 36 million dollars. Every team that earns less than this is below average and that is apparently 14 teams.

That's what I figured, it only makes sense if you round it, not use the exact average down to the last dollar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Garrett Wilson is doubtful

      By CRA · Posted

      Technically speaking, Fields has been a better QB than Bryce Young in the NFL.  I mean it’s bottom rung comparing by BY isn’t better.  Thats what I don’t get about the talk this week.  We don’t have a QB edge 
    • tukafan21
      Garrett Wilson is doubtful

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Might be different against a team with no legitimate pass catching options outside of their rookie TE though.  Their #1 WR tomorrow has 8 catches this season, next best WR receptions number this year is 4. If we can't defend that while Horn travels with their TE, then we have some serious problems.   Maybe we don't end up doing that in the end, but it's probably how I'd be scheming up the defense tomorrow when they have only 1 non RB pass catching option.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2025 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I fought sleep to stay awake just to watch that fumble on the goal line as we were going in for the go ahead score and said fug it, I'm going to bed. I've seen this movie before. I know how this ends. This bullshit of having California teams in conference with east coast teams is trash. That game probably didn't end until 2:30AM. Hell, it was 2AM at the time of the fumble and there was still 3+ minutes to play. In conference games being played into the 2AM hour for local audiences is terrible for the game. And the worst rule in football really does need fixed. Fumbling through the endzone or a fumble recovers by the D in the end zone should not result in a touch back and the ball on the 20. Fumbling through the endzone should not be a turnover. Fumbling out of bounds isn't a turnover anywhere else on the field. That should be the offense's ball on the one yard line. If the D recovers it in the endzone it should be the D's ball on the one yard line. Everyone knows this and everyone talks about it so just fix it already. If Cal was getting the ball at the goal line instead of out to the 20 I would've kept watching. That's a completely different scenario than the ball at the 20.
×
×
  • Create New...