Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes, Shaq was indeed the BPA


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Before the draft I telegraphed to you the top targets in the first round. 

 

Gurley -> Humphries -> Shaq -> Peat .... in that order. This wasn't based on my own opinion, but other sources. 

 

 

True to form, Gettleman chose the BPA and not the position of greatest need. 

 

It was not a reach. Gettleman truly believes Shaq was the most talented football player on the board at 25. 

 

 

He may not have been your BPA, or the media's BPA, but he definitely was Gettleman's. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my only complaint is those cunts in Arizona stole the chance away from us to decide between Humphries and Shaq- that would have been interesting 

 

 

Would have been Humphries

 

 

and yes, would still have been Shaq if Peat was on the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq was only the best player in the minds of Gettleman and his little minions. 

 

Look, I like the guy---Gettleman and Shaq---but neither were the BPA last night.

 

 

Gettleman's opinion ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Your opinion _ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main complaint is: if we had Humphries rated that highly, we should have gone up and got him. Everybody and their mother knew AZ was taking him. Disappointed we didn't move ahead of Det. bc this would have been the year to trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman's opinion ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Your opinion _ 

 

 

Before I drank some of that snake oil that Gettleman was selling last year, I was of the opinion that Bell and Chandler were shaky at the very best, and I was also of the opinion that our wide receiving corps was extremely uninspiring and lacking. Well, I hate to tell you, I was correct on both accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You do, the guy who doesn’t appear to grasp projection.  as the entire board knows, I do in fact, take positions.  The position here I have taken is that Bryce Young is a weak bottom tier starting QB, without NFL starting QB tools, that we must move on from.  
    • The OP for one. Asserting that people blamed Bryce for the loss in the title of the thread. That was not the prevailing sentiment at the time this thread was created. Very much a minority thing, I don’t remember but maybe one person if that, putting it on Bryce as the main reason. Troll thread. Did a good job too. Look at the pages.  Someone counting up the draft picks as 10 on offense and 10 on defense or whatever the number was, today or yesterday - of which the offensive ones were heavily 1s and 2s and the defensive picks were heavily day 3 and declaring that proof that the offense wasn’t favored like people claim. The obvious neglect we watched for two years. I spent time refuting that bullshit because someone needed to.  People saying we are bad horrible people and hate poor lil Bryce for no reason, as if it is a personal thing. Constantly.   Along the same lines is people saying we non Bryce fans would rather lose than have him play well and the team wins. That we are mad when the team wins   Point illustrated.       
×
×
  • Create New...