Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano breaks down Newton vs Brees and Ryan


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

He starts by using a bit where he states things cam needs to do, win the division,   then pretends someone told him cam has already done that.  Then goes on to say what else can this guy do,  he's gone up and won against these other QBs that people say are better .  Sure he's not as good a pocket Passer but he more than makes up for that as a physical guy,   a runner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

You took it in about as much of a negative light as one can.  The analysis was spot on, and Cam isn't a very good pocket passer.  Can he get better?  Yes, but right now.  His stats show him being a pretty average QB passing wise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...