Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano breaks down Newton vs Brees and Ryan

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CarolinaSamurai Newbie

CarolinaSamurai

Posted
Posted

He starts by using a bit where he states things cam needs to do, win the division,   then pretends someone told him cam has already done that.  Then goes on to say what else can this guy do,  he's gone up and won against these other QBs that people say are better .  Sure he's not as good a pocket Passer but he more than makes up for that as a physical guy,   a runner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EightyNine Newbie

EightyNine

Posted
Posted

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

You took it in about as much of a negative light as one can.  The analysis was spot on, and Cam isn't a very good pocket passer.  Can he get better?  Yes, but right now.  His stats show him being a pretty average QB passing wise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SOJA
      Delete this franchise

      By SOJA · Posted

      Honestly I haven no idea what I would have even done last night, Edgecomb was the most realistic option to improve our team 
    • carpanfan96
      Delete this franchise

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      He doesn't have the athleticism to play in the NBA. He had the worst numbers of anyone who worked out in this draft. He's legitimately the least athletic player in this draft, which is saying something.   His ceiling is Kyle Korver, with his lack of athleticism he's more likely to be out of the league in 5-6 years like Jimmer Fredette. 
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      Well, he was in probably every NBA franchise's top 6 or 7. Obviously it's nice to take the swing and it work out. But when a guy refuses to work out for your team, is probably the guy refusing to play with LaMelo, has sketchy handlers, etc.? You want...to take that swing? A desperate team does, sure. Which the Hornets are. But a smart team doesn't. Which is what they will hopefully become.  Kon isn't a superstar, but his floor is Kyle Korver. Is that what you want in the 4th pick? Not really, but he's your 4th guy on a good team and what I think Charles Lee wants in a player.  Trade down would've been nice, but for who? Tre Johnson would've been my guy, but he's gone if we trade with Brooklyn. If Washington wanted Ace, I doubt it would've taken much to come get him. Trade down and get Maluach (knowing you're trading Mark) would make sense and may have been the play, but I think Kon helps the team on the court and changing a culture. Not so sure about some of the guys in the 8-12 range. 
×
×
  • Create New...