Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano breaks down Newton vs Brees and Ryan


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

He starts by using a bit where he states things cam needs to do, win the division,   then pretends someone told him cam has already done that.  Then goes on to say what else can this guy do,  he's gone up and won against these other QBs that people say are better .  Sure he's not as good a pocket Passer but he more than makes up for that as a physical guy,   a runner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

You took it in about as much of a negative light as one can.  The analysis was spot on, and Cam isn't a very good pocket passer.  Can he get better?  Yes, but right now.  His stats show him being a pretty average QB passing wise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • too old, too expensive and would take draft capital
    • I saw the list, agree Minshew would be on the list of possible guys as well as the rest of the list.  Mac Jones would probably be the highest possible target though that would require a trade. All that said, heres a darkhorse that I wouldnt be surprised...Carson Wentz.  I know he looked rough his last time out, however he was clearly pretty dangerously injured and kept playing through it.  When he was healthy in Minnesota he looked pretty fricken good.  Last full season he started he threw for 3500, 27td, 7 INT.  He did start the next season for a washington team running a scheme that does not fit him.  I think the things that Canales is looking for his QB to do, that Wentz does well.   Wentz however with his age would not be any kind of long term solution, a decent backup but more like actual competition would be needed to go into the season.  
    • This reads as someone trying to suggest changes while treading lightly so Daddy Tepper doesn’t come down too hard on them.  Because flatly, the problem is Bryce.  I don’t think Canales is a perfect coach, but you can see the limitations in what can be called, what is called, and the amount of times Bryce fugs up plays all by himself.  Someone brought up the bootlegs being useless because there is always a free defender rushing - think about how different that play looks with a 6’2”+ QB with a strong arm and mobility.  I can’t count the number of times Bryce has thrown and missed bc he can’t see, it gets deflected, he chucks it away, or his patented run and fumble just on bootlegs and roll outs.  By percentage of those plays per player I have ever watched, Bryce has more negative plays WITHOUT A fuging DOUBT than anyone I have ever watched before.  Like an uncanny ability to fug up the simplest of things.  I have never seen anything like it.  And then, as I mentioned in the other thread, when you string those seemingly one-off plays together, and those stack over the course of a game, poo looks really disjointed.  It is Bryce.  Enough of this nebulous ass “something’s afoot!” bullshit.
×
×
  • Create New...