Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strip...Pers


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Vernon Davis: Not so good at Family Feud

 

Tight end Vernon Davis may have created the most unintentionally hilarious video of their offseason, with one of the worst Family Feud answers in the history of the game.

Via The Diamondback, Davis was part of the celebrity version of the popular game show last night, in an episode pitting AFC players against NFC players, when he came up with his own version of the football follies.

When host Steve Harvey asked players to “Name something that follows the word strip,” Davis thought he had hit one out of the park.

“Pers,” he replied with a bit of a confused look, dropping a solid suffix but something less than a good answer.

 

Good job representing the Niners, Vernon.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't say it had to be a word. Just something that follows "strip." It was the first thing that popped into my mind. 

'Pers' doesn't technically follow 'strip' because 'strippers' is a different word.

I have no doubt they wrote that question with the idea that somebody would say that, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the show, in the lightning round or whatever:

 

Name something that is allowed to go fast through city streets...

...T Suggs' answer: Motorcycle. Nice. Just nice.

Ben Roethlisberger and Kellen Winslow II agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...