Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Overreacting to Preseason Games


t96

Recommended Posts

Well, some people are just as guilty of holding on to the past and making legends out of JAGs because of a couple of plays out of an entire season.  This is not about hyperbole or holding on to people because you like them, or because they have been around for a long time.  There's much too much of that on the Huddle.  Gettleman has made me believe: There is no place for emotion when you're trying to build a champion. Those who are good guys and have served you well can be given their much-deserved pat on the back as you see them out the door. But sometimes change is just necessary.

It's got nothing to do with emotion or liking a guy for reasons other than his play on the field. And you'll see that come regular season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huddle, you've done it yet again. You've appointed Jarrett Boykin our #1 WR based on 6 catches against the Dolphins 2s and 3s (on 12 targets). Corey Brown isn't making the team because of 1 drop. And you've even gone as far as to put Wegher ahead of Tolbert, CAP and Todman based on a few, albeit very impressive, runs against the opposing team's 3s. Last week you appointed Rakim Cox our starting DE. Hell, now Terry Redden is better than Cole and Dwan according to you. Just layoff on making vast predictions based on a few plays in a preseason game. I can't imagine what this place will be like after Friday if we get absolutely lit up in all facets of the game by New England.  Only 3 more weeks of this before we can finally get some meaningful football. Please just allow the Huddle to be at least bearable until the 13th.

that's because the avg huddler is about 14 yo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...