Don't forget the 2013 J.Boykin

[Jmac]

.When the Packers where desimated with injuries all season long with Cobb,Jones and Finely missing games, this guy came in and met the challenge. When Rodgers went down he still produced. 2014 he took a backseat to a WR corp that is one of the best in the league. He has shown that the pressure isn't to much for him when called upon. Playing well on a Superbowl caliber team is something to be considered. We are one more injury away from this WR  corps being total crap. This guy needs to get his chance and stick.

 

[Fox007]

Boykin is our 2nd best WR we can only hope the coaching staff is actually hiding that fact and plan on starting him week 1 opposite Funchess.....

What's also hard to forget is...Smitty...with him here we'd be in fantastic shape...4-94-1 63 yard TD last game...it's still sickening.

 

 

[Gallagher]

I think once thinks shake out, our starting WRs this year will be Funchess, Boykin and Ginn. I just hope it doesn't take until week 10 for Ron to make lineup changes.

[PantherKyle]

Definitely should be seeing more time with ones. Especially over Bersin.

[t96]

I think once thinks shake out, our starting WRs this year will be Funchess, Boykin and Ginn. I just hope it doesn't take until week 10 for Ron to make lineup changes.

Our base set is not 3 WRs. 

[top dawg]

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

[t96]

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

Nobody here has "agenda driven, ulterior motives."

[TheRed]

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

I always enjoy reading you post about others having an agenda. Worth a quality chuckle at least.

Nobody knows which Boykin is the real Boykin at this point. He may get the opportunity to show us.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

You just really don't understand the financial/lockeroom part of the whole Smitty thing still, do you?

well that and how steve said he would have retired after 2014 if he wasn't released

[Steves89]

You just really don't understand the lockeroom part of the whole Smitty thing still, do you?

Fixed.

[Fox007]

You just really don't understand the financial/lockeroom part of the whole Smitty thing still, do you?

I understand everything my post was about how much his loss has hurt our offense(we have no explosive players at the skill positions)...nowhere did I say anything about why or how he was released. Smitty was/is an all time fan favorite/best player his loss still sucks...dood did get into another fight in the preseason...he may be getting "worse" in that regard as he ages...he seems to give even less fugs than he used to.

 

 

 

 

[top dawg]

I always enjoy reading you post about others having an agenda. Worth a quality chuckle at least.

Nobody knows which Boykin is the real Boykin at this point. He may get the opportunity to show us.

Boykin had barely any playing time in either of those years.  Hardly any! So if someone bases anything on those two years in and of themselves, then they just aren't that smart.  If you take his numbers in their totality, which is the smarter and generally accepted means of evaluation (not to mention taking things like injury into account),  then you get a clearer picture.  It's that simple. 

I can accept anyone telling me that Boykin is a JAG,  or that Boykin is a WR4 at best,  but don't tell me that he sucks based on 2014 or 2012 because it makes little sense. 

[Mol3m4n]

Don't forget 2014 Boykin with 23 yards and Aaron Rodgers as his quarterback. 

[TheRed]

Boykin had barely any playing time in either of those years.  Hardly any! So if someone bases anything on those two years in and of themselves, then they just aren't that smart.  If you take his numbers in their totality, which is the smarter and generally accepted means of evaluation (not to mention taking things like injury into account),  then you get a clearer picture.  It's that simple. 

I can accept anyone telling me that Boykin is a JAG,  or that Boykin is a WR4 at best,  but don't tell me that he sucks based on 2014 or 2012 because it makes little sense. 

You know I have to bust your chops a little.

I don't think he sucks. Considering our options right now at the position, I'm willing to give just about anyone a shot at this point.