Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question: put together trade package for WR


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Huddle question: if you could conjure up a trade for a decent WR, what would it involve? Draft picks?  Draft picks and a player? Who would this player be and which draft picks? Who would you try to trade for?

Funchess is a work in progress and the progress seems to be crawling along at this rate (no pun intended). I think D.G will wait till the final cuts but doubt anyone worth a damn will be there. So if he suprises us and pulls the trigger....who and how should it go down. What you got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't extremely deep at many positions yet, but you would have to figure it would be a TD scorer, with at least 2 years left on his contract, and a pretty low cap number for DG to consider it.

Derek Anderson will have the highest trade value on the roster that isn't a "starter".

I just don't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not at all up to speed on trade strategies, so I don't think I'll try this, but is there any team desperately needing help at LB?  Could AJ Klein or Glanton be of interest to any team.  We are so ridiculously deep at LB.... but it's hard to imagine trading a starting WR for LB depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't extremely deep at many positions yet, but you would have to figure it would be a TD scorer, with at least 2 years left on his contract, and a pretty low cap number for DG to consider it.

Derek Anderson will have the highest trade value on the roster that isn't a "starter".

I just don't see it.

LB , RB , &  a backup QB, and a draft pick can get you a decent pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A trade is not going to happen. We really have no one of value to ship off and there really is not a WR on the block that will fit our need. 

Well, just keep in mind that by and large player-for-player deals are really rare in the NFL anyways. A team that's going to ship a player off is typically going to look at a pick as more valuable than bringing another player (and more salary) in. Chip Kelly is really one of the few GMs in the league that has done player-for-player trades recently.

Anyway, if we go that route, I just don't want to give up anything more than a 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yea its not that easy. 

 

 

Any wide receiver on the block fits our need......

I think the problem is every team is going to want a 2nd for a subpar player. I might be wrong but it just seems to me there is no savior coming in at this point. 

Hell the Packers are suffering from the same thing, it just sucks when you lose the guys that are supposed to be the one,two, punch of your team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah not taking that Burns trade was infinitely stupid. We seem to be finally righting the ship but, imo, our biggest issue since Tepper bought the team has been coaches and management having a poor understanding of where our own roster is at. Starting with that idiot Rhule drinking his own kool-aid and thinking he was going to come and take the NFL by storm with Teddy freaking Bridgewater. Could have just kept Cam on the last year of his contract and gone from there but noooo that fat slob had to feel like he was the big man on campus. First round wizard Marty Hurney who, for whatever his faults, has a freaking HOF track record with first round picks, wants to trade up for Hebert but fat fug Rhule says no. Then we kept Rhule for 3 years which is absolutely unbelievable to me and every single year he treated our roster like it was just one player away trading our draft picks for Sam Darnold and Baker Mayfield who have proven since leaving that Matt Rhule was an even bigger idiot of a coach than we thought. We finally seem to understand we are a ways off and trade CMC, but then we don’t take the actual good trade for Brian Burns who was never better than a run of the mill situational pass rusher. Then we botch the self scout of our OL (and team) after Wilks, even though they were bad before Wilks simplified the scheme, thinking they can execute whatever the hell Reich and Brown were trying to do. So we win a couple meaningless games playing dummy ball and Fitterer thinks we’re a player away again. And nobody even considers that having the slowest receiving corps imaginable with Damiere freaking Byrd, who can’t even make it to the season before being injured and cut, as your only hope for speed, coupled with the worst pass blocking OL I’ve ever seen, might lead to titanic levels of disaster. The way Canales and Morgan have been adamant about constantly bringing competition at every position has been refreshing and made a huge difference. I was kind of worried that we had fallen into our old ways leading up to the draft with all the talk of defense only and worried that they might feel the offense was set. Very glad to see they were not complacent on that. My big thing now is I’m still wondering why Evero is still here. I can’t think of a single player who has gotten better under him, and the Broncos defense got better once he left. We’ll see.
    • really good interview that gives some insight into their decision making process in making up the schedules and the issues they run into with so many people broadcasting games now. also some interesting discussion on what they have going on and where they might be heading in the international games. vikings have 2 of them, btw. we might be seeing more of that.     
    • wow i absolutely LOVED watching that.   will watch again...and again...and again.
×
×
  • Create New...