Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question: put together trade package for WR


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Huddle question: if you could conjure up a trade for a decent WR, what would it involve? Draft picks?  Draft picks and a player? Who would this player be and which draft picks? Who would you try to trade for?

Funchess is a work in progress and the progress seems to be crawling along at this rate (no pun intended). I think D.G will wait till the final cuts but doubt anyone worth a damn will be there. So if he suprises us and pulls the trigger....who and how should it go down. What you got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't extremely deep at many positions yet, but you would have to figure it would be a TD scorer, with at least 2 years left on his contract, and a pretty low cap number for DG to consider it.

Derek Anderson will have the highest trade value on the roster that isn't a "starter".

I just don't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not at all up to speed on trade strategies, so I don't think I'll try this, but is there any team desperately needing help at LB?  Could AJ Klein or Glanton be of interest to any team.  We are so ridiculously deep at LB.... but it's hard to imagine trading a starting WR for LB depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't extremely deep at many positions yet, but you would have to figure it would be a TD scorer, with at least 2 years left on his contract, and a pretty low cap number for DG to consider it.

Derek Anderson will have the highest trade value on the roster that isn't a "starter".

I just don't see it.

LB , RB , &  a backup QB, and a draft pick can get you a decent pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A trade is not going to happen. We really have no one of value to ship off and there really is not a WR on the block that will fit our need. 

Well, just keep in mind that by and large player-for-player deals are really rare in the NFL anyways. A team that's going to ship a player off is typically going to look at a pick as more valuable than bringing another player (and more salary) in. Chip Kelly is really one of the few GMs in the league that has done player-for-player trades recently.

Anyway, if we go that route, I just don't want to give up anything more than a 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yea its not that easy. 

 

 

Any wide receiver on the block fits our need......

I think the problem is every team is going to want a 2nd for a subpar player. I might be wrong but it just seems to me there is no savior coming in at this point. 

Hell the Packers are suffering from the same thing, it just sucks when you lose the guys that are supposed to be the one,two, punch of your team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...