Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FBGPs NFL Gameplan Week 2 Panthers/Texans Preview

FootballCzar

By FootballCzar,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

RelaxImaPro Enthusiast

RelaxImaPro

Posted
Posted

One big flaw with that play you drew up... you completely forgot about out other LBer, Thomas Davis or "this guy" as stated in the video, as if he's just going to be standing around with his thumb up his butt watching the play unfold and just assume since Luke has to pick then someone is going to be open.  Thomas Davis is just as good in coverage as Luke is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown on 1 Experienced

X-Clown on 1

Posted
Posted

That "high-low" game plan is just absurdly bad.  Do you really think the strong side backer is just going to sit on the line as the slot receiver streaks down the seam?  No, he's going to fold back into his zone, hence picking up the TE that you have going "high".  The weak side backer is going to come down and jam the back coming off the line that's going "low" and either hand him off to Luke, or he'll stay with him.  Either way, there are no open receivers on this play and most likely, one of the middle receivers will be doubled with this coverage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted

The Broncos/Chiefs graphic slipped by the edit room but it happens. Bigger issue is Chris James starting the Houston D/ST over the Panthers D/ST. Emory, didn't you send him the memo about the Panthers looking sound at all 3 levels of D, how in football math having 2 QBs = not having 1, and how the numbers for WR Hopkins and Washington came against prevent D? Plus Chris then picking Cam for a QB start is just contradictory to picking Houston's D/ST. Thinking Houston is gonna put up 27 on a top 10 D with "Who?" at QB smh

But thank you Emory for sharing those insights here

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FootballCzar Newbie

FootballCzar

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks Gang! We're trying to play around with different formats to like Top Dawg says to add more spice.

That "high-low" game plan is just absurdly bad.  Do you really think the strong side backer is just going to sit on the line as the slot receiver streaks down the seam?  No, he's going to fold back into his zone, hence picking up the TE that you have going "high".  The weak side backer is going to come down and jam the back coming off the line that's going "low" and either hand him off to Luke, or he'll stay with him.  Either way, there are no open receivers on this play and most likely, one of the middle receivers will be doubled with this coverage.  

I forgot, no yards can and will be given up on the Panthers defense...all passing windows --- especially ones dealing with crossers that are designed to flash, stop, and/or sit in any passing window -- will all be sheet rocked off because it never happens.

 

Yo how'd that prediction work out for you last week?

You should switch that part up. 

My bad 16-0! Does that work for you? It's a prediction, not a verdict. I'm more concerned with the analysis than the outcome..but for you, the Panthers will win every week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

Thanks Gang! We're trying to play around with different formats to like Top Dawg says to add more spice.

 

I forgot, no yards can and will be given up on the Panthers defense...all passing windows --- especially ones dealing with crossers that are designed to flash, stop, and/or sit in any passing window -- will all be sheet rocked off because it never happens.

 

My bad 16-0! Does that work for you? It's a prediction, not a verdict. I'm more concerned with the analysis than the outcome..but for you, the Panthers will win every week.

Don't get irritated.  People are salty cause you picked us to go 0-2 (IDK your Week 3 prediction).  First quarter of the season is always difficult to predict.  I think, as we win, people will start agreeing with your analysis and pro-panthers predictions.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

I thought picking the Jags was a big mistake. I pointed out that their offense was young and would make big mistakes against our very good veteran defense. I was upset at the time because nothing in the video convinced me that we were going to lose to the inferior Jags. Sure enough we won. We were the better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceBoogie Veteran

AceBoogie

Posted
Posted

One big flaw with that play you drew up... you completely forgot about out other LBer, Thomas Davis or "this guy" as stated in the video, as if he's just going to be standing around with his thumb up his butt watching the play unfold and just assume since Luke has to pick then someone is going to be open.  Thomas Davis is just as good in coverage as Luke is.

Better actually 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jb2288
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By jb2288 · Posted

      He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • MrBubba
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By MrBubba · Posted

      Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...