Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We could go 12-4 and still not win the division. Look at these easy ass schedules y'all


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

We're 3-0 and there are only 3 or 4 games the rest of the way we'd be underdogs at right now: @Seattle, vs. Green Bay, @Atlanta, maybe @Dallas depending on Romo. But the Falcons have an easier record. They only have TWO opponents left on their schedule with winning records: Minnesota and two games against YOUR Carolina Panthers. The Falcons might have a historically easy schedule and are going to rack up serious win totals. If we split with the Falcons, we might be looking at 12-4 and the Falcons might be looking at 12-4 or 13-3. It would be inexcusable if we don't go 4-0, but it would honestly be inexcusable if the Falcons don't start 9-0. They're 3-0 and their next 6 are Houston and Washington at home, New Orleans and Tennessee on the road, Tampa Bay at home, San Francisco on the road. Ho. Lee. Sheet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've honestly escaped being 0-3 by a fuging ass hair.  Sure, they've got a ridiculously easy schedule, but they're not going to win all of them.  Their 3 wins are honestly more about how the Eagles, Giants, and Cowboys absolutely choked away what should have been wins.

We're not great or anything, but neither are they.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could sweep them in December and their schedule is so easy they might finish 14-2. They play NOBODY.

Take julio out and they are a very average team at best. No easy feat as he has proven he can abuse even good,  around top ten, corners. But Norman proved twice last year the elite once can do it. 

So the question is more are they playing any elite corners. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...