Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Cotch is back for Seattle who gets cut, if anyone?


WesleyM

Recommended Posts

Today coach Rivera said it was possible Cotch would be healthy for the Seattle game. My question is does anyone get the axe with him becoming active? I honestly believe Bersin has contributed enough over the last few weeks to stay on the roster. He is a great posession guy. My thought is to cut the guy from Seattle and if he clears waviers add him to the PS. It is clear he hasnt picked up the system and I would think if a danger of him getting picked up existed we probably would have given more than a conditional 7th to get the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I'm glad none of you are GMs cutting a guy that's barely seen the field? Who has potential and is young? Y'all are getting crazy in the Huddle these days

I'm sure no GM wants to cut a guy. But it has to happen. 

It's not that you want to cut guy, but we are playing to win. If Norwood can't help that right now, bye. Say hi to the practice squad. His turn might come again this year. Who do you propose we cut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean he is on the roster, we could just make a different player inactive, but that would be too logical.

Correct.

Cotchery isn't on IR.  They don't absolutely have to cut anybody if he's healthy.  They can just deactivate someone.

Now, it is possible that they might, but they don't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct.

Cotchery isn't on IR.  They don't absolutely have to cut anybody if he's healthy.  They can just deactivate someone.

Now, it is possible that they might, but they don't have to.

Stop, the both of you!

Knowledge of the rules and logic have no place in the huddle!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we have some revisionist around it here because of all the drama around Tepper's involvement. If you pull up any scouting report from the time you'll see the same take. WalterFootball's report sums up the media's thoughts on him well: "Young has everything the NFL is looking for in a quarterback except in terms of weight and height." He was the consensus top QB of his draft and the only real question mark they had about him was whether his body could hold up in the NFL. The infamous Steph Curry comparison the Panthers latched onto came from Albert Breer. The excuses I've heard for him are more anecdotal. Bryce Young's development is the only bullet point most NFL fans have on the Panthers right now. That and the coaching turnover. If you're not actually watching our games it's easy to believe this is just a dysfunctional organization that doesn't know how to unleash this talented Heisman winner.  I've seen media and fans alike run with that narrative way more than criticizing Young outright. Whenever we win there's flocks who use it as proof that the Panthers just need to be patient.  
    • So maybe 1-3 vs playoff teams, going by standings as of today. I guess that is an improvement.  We are just about improved enough to be in purgatory draft wise. It really isn’t so bad in the 1st unless you really want that top QB or maybe edge guy because there are usually plenty of good players at the top but it hurts you some as get deeper in the draft. 
×
×
  • Create New...