Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Worst Division in Football


EgoDogg

Recommended Posts

The 'worst' division in football (NFC South) isn't looking too 'weak' in the grand scheme of things right now. If anything, our division is the class of the NFC. Last year was a fluke year for the NFC South. But one bad year makes a non NFC-East division terrible.

AFC East: 11-6 = 0.64

NFC South: 12-7 = 0.63

AFC North: 10-9 = 0.53

AFC West: 10-9 = 0.53

NFC North: 9-10 = 0.47

NFC East: 9-11 = 0.45

NFC West: 9-11 = 0.45

AFC South: 6-13 (lol) = 0.32

P.S. fug THE FALCONS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucs and Aints are among the worst 5 teams in the league. And the Falcons ain't anywhere close to as good as their 5-0 record. We're the best team in the league though so I guess that outweighs all the other sh*tty teams in our division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going by the eye-test, the NFCE is the worst division in football. When Romo went down, that really changed the dynamics of that division. 

The NFCW is the strongest dilvision for sure. Not saying they can keep up with NE, Ari or the Bengals, but from top-to-bottom, any team in that conference could make it into the playoffs and get a win...and if one of them gets home-field advantage, lookout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going by the eye-test, the NFCE is the worst division in football. When Romo went down, that really changed the dynamics of that division. 

The NFCW is the strongest dilvision for sure. Not saying they can keep up with NE, Ari or the Bengals, but from top-to-bottom, any team in that conference could make it into the playoffs and get a win...and if one of them gets home-field advantage, lookout. 

....What? The Seahawks are trash. The Rams are trash. And the 49ers may be the worst team in the league. Cardinals may be 4-1 but they've played an even easier schedule than us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going by the eye-test, the NFCE is the worst division in football. When Romo went down, that really changed the dynamics of that division. 

The NFCW is the strongest dilvision for sure. Not saying they can keep up with NE, Ari or the Bengals, but from top-to-bottom, any team in that conference could make it into the playoffs and get a win...and if one of them gets home-field advantage, lookout. 

The Cardinals ARE in that garbage division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC South has been the worst division for like 10 years now.

The "NFC South is the worst division in football" shtick is over. One off year and people came down hard on us. There could possibly be two NFC South teams that make the playoffs this year just like the year before last, while the AFC South continues to suck ass per usual, yet I won't hear a damn complaint once the Colts win that division at 7-9 because they get to stock up 6 easy wins from playing Jags, Titans, and Texans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....What? The Seahawks are trash. The Rams are trash. And the 49ers may be the worst team in the league. Cardinals may be 4-1 but they've played an even easier schedule than us. 

neither of those teams are trash. Take off your blinders and also take note of the Cardinals as well. Thanks and you're welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC South has been the worst division for like 10 years now.

The "NFC South is the worst division in football" shtick is over. One off year and people came down hard on us. There could possibly be two NFC South teams that make the playoffs this year just like the year before last, while the AFC South continues to suck ass per usual, yet I won't hear a damn complaint once the Colts win that division at 7-9 because they get to stock up 6 easy wins from playing Jags, Titans, and Texans.

AFC East I believe has the worst record over the last 15 years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...