Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Worst Division in Football


EgoDogg

Recommended Posts

The 'worst' division in football (NFC South) isn't looking too 'weak' in the grand scheme of things right now. If anything, our division is the class of the NFC. Last year was a fluke year for the NFC South. But one bad year makes a non NFC-East division terrible.

AFC East: 11-6 = 0.64

NFC South: 12-7 = 0.63

AFC North: 10-9 = 0.53

AFC West: 10-9 = 0.53

NFC North: 9-10 = 0.47

NFC East: 9-11 = 0.45

NFC West: 9-11 = 0.45

AFC South: 6-13 (lol) = 0.32

P.S. fug THE FALCONS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucs and Aints are among the worst 5 teams in the league. And the Falcons ain't anywhere close to as good as their 5-0 record. We're the best team in the league though so I guess that outweighs all the other sh*tty teams in our division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going by the eye-test, the NFCE is the worst division in football. When Romo went down, that really changed the dynamics of that division. 

The NFCW is the strongest dilvision for sure. Not saying they can keep up with NE, Ari or the Bengals, but from top-to-bottom, any team in that conference could make it into the playoffs and get a win...and if one of them gets home-field advantage, lookout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going by the eye-test, the NFCE is the worst division in football. When Romo went down, that really changed the dynamics of that division. 

The NFCW is the strongest dilvision for sure. Not saying they can keep up with NE, Ari or the Bengals, but from top-to-bottom, any team in that conference could make it into the playoffs and get a win...and if one of them gets home-field advantage, lookout. 

....What? The Seahawks are trash. The Rams are trash. And the 49ers may be the worst team in the league. Cardinals may be 4-1 but they've played an even easier schedule than us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going by the eye-test, the NFCE is the worst division in football. When Romo went down, that really changed the dynamics of that division. 

The NFCW is the strongest dilvision for sure. Not saying they can keep up with NE, Ari or the Bengals, but from top-to-bottom, any team in that conference could make it into the playoffs and get a win...and if one of them gets home-field advantage, lookout. 

The Cardinals ARE in that garbage division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC South has been the worst division for like 10 years now.

The "NFC South is the worst division in football" shtick is over. One off year and people came down hard on us. There could possibly be two NFC South teams that make the playoffs this year just like the year before last, while the AFC South continues to suck ass per usual, yet I won't hear a damn complaint once the Colts win that division at 7-9 because they get to stock up 6 easy wins from playing Jags, Titans, and Texans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....What? The Seahawks are trash. The Rams are trash. And the 49ers may be the worst team in the league. Cardinals may be 4-1 but they've played an even easier schedule than us. 

neither of those teams are trash. Take off your blinders and also take note of the Cardinals as well. Thanks and you're welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC South has been the worst division for like 10 years now.

The "NFC South is the worst division in football" shtick is over. One off year and people came down hard on us. There could possibly be two NFC South teams that make the playoffs this year just like the year before last, while the AFC South continues to suck ass per usual, yet I won't hear a damn complaint once the Colts win that division at 7-9 because they get to stock up 6 easy wins from playing Jags, Titans, and Texans.

AFC East I believe has the worst record over the last 15 years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it depends on what you mean as 'elite'. I typically mean someone that can play with lower level pieces around them and still win. There are very few of those. 
    • It would obviously be incredible if Brooks came back and just ran away with the job on his opportunities like Rico Dowdle did last year. But any Panthers fan that has been around the block knows better than to go ahead and make plans for that. Brooks has missed a ton of not just playing time but meaningful early career growth in a league that has increasingly devalued the position from an investment standpoint beyond one or two superstars. There's really not any comparison to look back on that lines up with the current iteration of the league at least not favorably. The key thing that this RB room has going for them is our investment in the OL. The highest paid OL in the league two years in a row paired with our staff should make it easier for just about any RB to get into open running lanes. But that is also anything but a given considering our OL was largely middle of the pack last year. In the end it might all be a moot point anyways if we again struggle to establish a viable passing attack.
    • I don't have him making the team and I think same goes for the staff, but they are hopeful for a PS spot.    I mean of course I'd like 3 all-world at RB and every spot, just doesn't work that why. Panthers normally carry 3. dan always talk up Etienne, even called him a future star.....I think Brooks will be fine as a 2 with health pls.....  Chubba can carry a seasons load as lead dawg.    Its fine, I mean backup OGs or CB is much higher on my worry scale(Id even put QB room as worse than RB room too...)
×
×
  • Create New...