Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke Cleared to Play


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

Wasn't debating how good he is. He's very good.  Just said he's not as important to the current roster as Jared Allen is while CJ is on IR designated to return

Maybe not in these first 4 games, but he'll be just as important for the next 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to go through and quote everyone that brought my name up in this thread, but I was praying the whole time that Luke would be back this week at 100%. I was expecting the worse and hoping for the best, and in true Bwood fashion, I trolled the fug out of dozens of users on here with my extremely saracastic predictions and blatantly obvious "inside source" jokes. Couldn't be happier to be "wrong" (I guess?).

The funny thing is that I was banned for 24 hours after making a harsh joke towards a user that has receives way worse on a daily basis. I have no problem with taking a time out from an internet forum, but I do have a problem with the equility of these rules. I've been called F*gget, D-bag, dumbass, bitch, etc. soooo many times on here, and even after reporting some of these to see if I'm the only one getting these sort of punishments, nothing happens to the offenders.

Luckily, I have thick skin and enjoy the role I play on the huddle. Welcome back Luke!

bruh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't say you're the Cam Newton of this forum. Please, that's just asking for trouble.

 

And yeah, moderators on this board tend to let a lot of things go and they lay the ban stick around with the fairness of Ed Hochuli deciding on a roughing the passer call. It's just part of the deal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...