Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank our remaining games from toughest to softest


Frank Hollywood

Recommended Posts

Just curious as to everyone's take.

1. Dallas = destroyed

They have their back to the wall and have nothing to lose. It's do or die for Romo who is usually pretty clutch for November/December. Dez is back and healthy as well. They still don't look elite by any means though, at least not on Sunday.

2. Saints

Most will disagree with me here and I might be wrong, but Payton seemed to have the system in place to dink and dunk us last time with their BACKUP QB. Brees is obviously even better. The defense can't get any worse than it has been for the Saints the last few weeks (or can it?). Hopefully the coaches can look at game tape from last time and adjust.

3. Giants

Not a rollover team, but not worldbeaters. JPP is back, but is he doing much? Eli is Eli.

4. TB

Jamies is looking much improved, but they are coming to OUR house. The team has finally looked like they have developed some chemistry with one another, but it is still a brand new team as far as leadership.

5. ATL (their house)

6. ATL (our house)

Again, some won't agree, but ATL should be our easiest matchup yet. They have Julio, which Norman will erase and that is about it. Matt can throw for 6 picks and they'll still have him in there slinging the ball around like a drunk Brett Favre.

 

What are your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Cowboys - Because they are good with Romo but mostly the refs will NOT want us to win this, especially it being on Thanksgiving.

2. Giants - They seem to sometimes have our number out of nowhere.  You never know what Eli you get, he could throw 4 td's or 4 ints.

3. Falcons both times, just because, division rivalry and how it always goes.

4. Saints - Dude that defense... or lack of

5. TB - Not as bad as people think though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...