Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How the Panthers limited the Redskins to 14 rushing yards


countryboi

Recommended Posts

 

http://nflbreakdowns.com/kuechly-panthers-redskins-rushing/

Quote

With a 44-16 victory over the Redskins, the Kuechly-led Panthers’ defense limited the Redskins to 14 yards on 12 rushing attempts. In this breakdown, we will take a look at how the Carolina Panthers’ front seven achieved such a feat as they went on to win the game and go 10-0 for the season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just entering the drive chart data into my spreadsheet...

The Redskins' yards totals form quarters 2 - 4 are really bad.

Q 1:  3 drives 91 yards (1 drive was their 99 yard K/O return for TD which shows up on the stats as "0 yards", so really this should be 190 yards total)

Q 2:  3 drives, 28 yards

Q 3:  4 drives, 21 yards

Q 4:  3 drives: 28 yards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"But the Redskins are just as bad as every other team the over rated 10-0 Panthers are.  They haven't beat anyone, not like Miami with Romo at the helm.  You know he once save 38 orphans with just his smile!  And Romo would be the best president ever but he's not running so he can concentrate on winning all the Championships for the Cowboys.  Did you know he can win not only the NFL Championship, but the NHL, NBA, CFB, Checkers and Chess at the same time, as well as the requisite number of miracles to be sainted...."

Some folks just refuse to accept that the Panthers are a really great team.  This shows how well the individual and group elements work in harmony.  And why we are so tough defensively.  Everyone with a halfway decent offense thought they would run through us because they thought we were overrated...and what happened?

Dallas could very well make a little bit of a run, but we're not going to rollover because we wish we were at home with our families.  They are going to have to beat us at what we do well:  blocking and tackling.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

That was so beautiful.

That play right there is the dirty little secret the rest of the NFL don't want to face, it's not about how accurately Brady can launch the ball or how many one handed catches Odell Beckham can make. It's about fundamental football: out blocking, out tackling and winning at the line of scrimmage. At some point they will face the reality that their big men just aren't as fundamentally good as our big men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

That play right there is the dirty little secret the rest of the NFL don't want to face, it's not about how accurately Brady can launch the ball or how many one handed catches Odell Beckham can make. It's about fundamental football: out blocking, out tackling and winning at the line of scrimmage. At some point they will face the reality that their big men just aren't as fundamentally good as our big men.

Nice. 

Reminds me of Coach Bill Stewart's speech before the 2008 Fiesta Bowl. 

“It’s real simple: You out block them. You out tackle them. You out hit em. You out hustle em.

It works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...