Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Since we make fun of opposing fans for their simplistic ways for gameplanning against us, how would YOU do it?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

I know the answer however I refuse to tell how to exploit our team. I will say this, you will have to disguise your coverage and change it with less than 5 on the play clock. This is one type of coverage that would limit what we can do, it has been used against this year. It is the audibles that make this team so effective, that's why you show pass, let Cam audible to run, then audible to run coverage with less than 5 sec on the play clock. It is a guessing game but you must change coverage pre-snap. Let us never speak of this again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heavy d-line rotation, periodic stunts, man coverage with corners close to the receivers, jamming, a safety deep, the other a roamer who we're never quite sure where he's going to be.  I don't know that I'd even bother doubling Olsen since the run is just as much of a liability, so the safeties would have to be mindful of both.  Keep everything in front of you, make the Panthers do nothing but 3 to 4 to 5 yard plays at a time, don't allow anything deep, and hope for third and longs where you'd do zone blitzes, more stunts, the odd blitz.  The safeties and linebackers would also have to be mindful of spying Cam and then of course you're scared about Brown and Ginn's speed.

Offensively, much the same idea...west coast offense by and large, deep shots if and only if they're there, do not by any means throw into windows where the pass isn't there, and typically the middle of the line of scrimmage is open due to zone deficiencies in McD's gameplan.  I'd only go after Norman with bump and go routes, things that make him pause a step or two, things that make him have to hesitate just a hitch.  By and large, as others have said though, you'd have to throw away from him and Coleman.  Obviously as a Cats guy I'm hoping we play Boston more as the playoffs happen...

The biggest offensive key would be avoiding turnovers and third and longs.  Don't let the pass rush wake up.  The offensive bread and butter would have to be using the speediest rbs you have, counters, maybe a couple sweeps though that usually doesn't work very well.  Theoretically a few draws might work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On defense, play cover 2 and take away the deep ball. Force us to run and try to survive on dink and dunk. When teams stack the box and play single high man free or cover 3 it plays right into our hands and we just go deep. Mix in some double A gap blitzes to disrupt Cam up the middle with DEs contain rushing. He struggles way more on up the middle pressure than outside pressure because outside pressure usually creates a big lane for him to run into. Bend but don't break defense to force us to sustain long drives is the key. We will kill you on chunk plays if you give us the chance.

On offense, the run game needs to be heavily cut back oriented. Occasionally you can catch Luke on an over pursuit and get huge yards with a cut back. Running sweeps is an awful idea. Luke and TD have that on lock. In the passing game, play 3 wide and attack with the slot WR. If you can get your WR1 in the slot and not matched up on Josh then that's a bonus. Underneath routes with slants and crosses are key. Trying to beat us deep on the outside is usually a failed strategy. Seam routes from the TE can work really well if you stay away from Luke as he plays that route better than anyone. Exploiting Roman and our slot CB in one on one match ups will get the passing game going.

Its not a foolproof strategy by any means as it still requires amazing talent and execution, but I feel like this would give a team the best chance to beat us without relying on us to play awful or have a bunch of turnovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I made fun of people giving simplistic answers to stopping us is because the answer isn't simple. No one scheme or simple philosophy will work all game. Since Cam makes his reads at the line you confuse him by changing looks and schemes right before the snap. You look like you are going to blitz and drop into coverage. You do a lot of delayed blitzes and run blitz frequently. And so on. You have to mix things up and not be predictable using a mixture of zone coverages and man looks. It isn't simple and it won't be doing one thing but switching things up and being unpredictable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I think I would to a lot of three and even four wide sets and attack Harper and Jones

Defensively I would try to avoid big plays and be content with us making long marches up and down the field, just hope you can hold to FGs.

On special teams I would aggresively go for blocks and put pressure on our kick coverage team when given the chance.  Last time we lost a regular season game this is how it was done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...