Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rejuvenated Giants Target Panthers


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

Not even close.....Seattle is a very good team.  The Giants are a bad team.

You missed my point but that's ok. 

I was not saying the Giants are a good team I am saying that playing a great team is their super bowl

if you recall the Giants gave the Patriots all they could handle. At least 3 other games they should have won 

the better a team is or the better known they are the target in the back gets larger and even also ran teams can rally for that one game

the panthers from here on out need to be at their best regardless of who they play

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my favorite (sarcasm) quote I am hearing gints fans hold onto.

Of the last 8 teams in the history of the NFL to start 13-0..... 5 lost game 14.

Of those 5 teams that lost, 2 lost to the giants.

 

Clearly this is a trend.  But when you have a defense like that you grasp at straws.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

You missed my point but that's ok. 

I was not saying the Giants are a good team I am saying that playing a great team is their super bowl

if you recall the Giants gave the Patriots all they could handle. At least 3 other games they should have won 

the better a team is or the better known they are the target in the back gets larger and even also ran teams can rally for that one game

the panthers from here on out need to be at their best regardless of who they play

Gotcha....did not get what you were saying at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to go ahead and predict an outcome similar to the Dallas game, where NY scores maybe twice and that's it. With really only one stellar receiver who should get shut-down, I just don't see them moving the ball against us. Plus, you pressure Eli and the dude will fold like origami.

31-14 Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...