Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 3 Reasons The Panthers Lost Today


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Navy_football said:

That was Chicago, where Josh Norman literally gave Brandon Marshall 7-10 yards cushion with outside leverage all the way down the field. They kicked a FG to win.

Oh thanks that's what I was thinking of. I don't know why I thought it was Roddy White for some reason. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Didn't Atlanta beat us in another heartbreaking game with nothing but slants?

Hopefully McDermott does some homework and doesn't let it become a trend for other teams to exploit as well. 

Man slants always beats this zone defense for YEARS. Don't hold your breath for a change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this was a strategic loss by Ron.  he knew there was no way anything atl did could stop them.  so he gave the other playoff teams he may face game tape on how to beat the panthers.  They will use atls game plan and fail miserably.  Ron has said repeatedly in press conference the goal is not 16-0. the goal is the superbowl.

This is what I believe as in no way Carolina actually got beat by the mangina of a team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, beastson said:

Man slants always beats this zone defense for YEARS. Don't hold your breath for a change

That technique can work when your DBs are better athletes and can close to make a break up. Players like Tillman and Jones aren't built for that. 

i think Nick Saban uses teaches the outside leverage technique in man to man. But, you know, he does have better athletes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

That technique can work when your DBs are better athletes and can close to make a break up. Players like Tillman and Jones aren't built for that. 

i think Nick Saban uses teaches the outside leverage technique in man to man. But, you know, he does have better athletes. 

But even Norman was getting killed by Julio on them slants. The soft zone with no press coverage is terrible and needs to stop if this team plans on winning a SB

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Agree.

Bend but don't break scheme. The whole goal of our defense is to not get beat deep or give up the big play which happened with Julio so that was a fail, but for the most part it works. However since Ron/Sean took over particularly the last 2 years of the playoffs, teams say ok well we'll just slant you and dink & dunk down the field and its been our consistent weakness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That can be a chicken or the egg scenario. Canales knows what the QB is good at and is not good at better than we do.  He would have reasons for not calling deep shots, if he is holding back. They could include protection concerns, as well as any Young related motivations.  I think there always the chance Bryce doesn’t see the man open down the field and it is just that simple, more than a confidence issue. Probably a mix of the two.   
    • This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC.  You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract.    But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 
    • No team hits on every pick.  Every coach and GM will eventually get fired.   We are a better team and have greatly increased the talent on the roster. Bad GMs lead to losses.   I love the teams current setup in the front office and the process in how we look at talent and coaching.  Canales has often said we want to have a player developmental philosophy as a core tenant.  I love that combined with cutting edge analytics and good football knowledge and experience.
×
×
  • Create New...