Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FWIW, Payton staying in NO


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

See, this is why you don't sell out and throw everything into a single season Super Bowl run.

If it doesn't pan out, you screwed yourself for nothing.

I think it very much depends on how you feel about the team you have and how much longer you have to compete. Brees is aging. If you're not going to go all in at the end of a HOF QBs career, when are you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the saints may enter their own lame duck season. if payton's just playing his contract out the ownership might use next year to try to burn out a ton of cap space and just waste the year. by 2017 brees and just about everyone on that team over the age of 25 will be gone and they'll be trying to put together the outline of a new team in the grimy cellar of the nfc south

can't wait!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I think it very much depends on how you feel about the team you have and how much longer you have to compete. Brees is aging. If you're not going to go all in at the end of a HOF QBs career, when are you? 

I don't think you should ever go "all in." That's the type of thing that puts the franchise in a terrible spot for years going forward and doesn't even guarantee a Super Bowl win. Continue to build the team and the QB position will take care of itself. If a HoF QB has to end his career with a couple mediocre years then so be it. The GM's focus shouldn't be doing what's best for the HoF QB but for the team's future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I was just letting you know it was 2. I don't think an extension makes sense for either party at this time. The team is coming off of two straight sub .500 years. That doesn't breed a lot of faith for ownership to extend a guy they own the rights to longer than those two years and it doesn't offer him the ability to maximize his profit.

I actually agree that it's not the time.  I was primarily just pointing out how all the "here to stay" talk was a tad overblown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, h0llywood said:

article should be changed to "no one was stupid enough to trade a second rounder to the taints so they are keeping him on board to save face"

Well, there is one "stupid enough" to make that trade by giving up a second rounder....I believe Jimmy Jones would. He may even take on the dumpster fire that is Johnny Manziel.

Still, I'm glad Payton is staying in New Orleans. I love to see the Panthers whop his cheating azz......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I think it very much depends on how you feel about the team you have and how much longer you have to compete. Brees is aging. If you're not going to go all in at the end of a HOF QBs career, when are you? 

The Saints have gone all in for the past 3-4 years, it's why they're in this mess. But I do agree they need to double down now while they still have Brees. I see a complete rebuild in the next 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, for one, am not pleased about this.  As much as I hate the pucker faced bastard, he's a really good HC.  He and Brees are the only thing that's kept that turd of a team from floating out into the gulf.  Loomis is the real problem, can't draft worth a poo and not good at contracts either.  He's basically Hurney, but worse in the 1st round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...