Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Marshawn Lynch doesn't play on Sunday, 54% of their total offense last time we played them will be out

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Sam Mills Fan Newbie

Sam Mills Fan

Posted
Posted

Lynch ran the ball 17 times for 54 yards and a touchdown against us with 1 catch for 0 yards. Very pedestrian numbers, but I would still rather face that guy named Christine at running back than him.

 

But there's an X-factor that hardly anybody is talking about this week. The Seahawks won't have Jimmy Graham for sure. He kinda killed us for 8 catches for 140 yards back in October. Luke Willson had a big catch against us a couple of years ago, but I'm much happier to see Willson than Graham.

 

Between Lynch and Graham, the Seahawks would be looking at losing 194 of their 356 total yards. Russell Wilson only threw for 101 yards to non-Jimmy Graham receivers back in October.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hawkfanadam Newbie

Hawkfanadam

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Wyank said:

Will Luke be playing? He was out against vikes right?

Luke is questionable. He was out against the Vikings, and was in limited practice. about 50/50 to play Sunday.

Edit: According to the Pete Carroll news conference about an hour ago, Willson should be good to go

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank Hollywood Newbie

Frank Hollywood

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Lynch ran the ball 17 times for 54 yards and a touchdown against us with 1 catch for 0 yards. Very pedestrian numbers, but I would still rather face that guy named Christine at running back than him.

 

But there's an X-factor that hardly anybody is talking about this week. The Seahawks won't have Jimmy Graham for sure. He kinda killed us for 8 catches for 140 yards back in October. Luke Willson had a big catch against us a couple of years ago, but I'm much happier to see Willson than Graham.

 

Between Lynch and Graham, the Seahawks would be looking at losing 194 of their 356 total yards. Russell Wilson only threw for 101 yards to non-Jimmy Graham receivers back in October.

 

 

Also Lockette is out for the year. Didn't he have that big catch against us over Coleman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LA_Panther Newbie

LA_Panther

Posted
Posted

I don't expect much from our front 4, so a steady mix of blitzes and zone play is key on defense. If we can get to Wilson early with our blitzes or even our front 4 [won't happen, but I like surprises lol] and put a couple of good hits on him, that will set the tone. This goes without saying, but also we gotta stop the run 

Wilson is a star and is one of the best players in the league, but his strength is still when he rolls out. If we keep him in the pocket, he'll still hit his underneath passes and lob his occasional hand grenades, but he won't make any game changing plays. 

On offense, one word => Remmers and the oline.

If we protect Cam, I don't care who plays defense for them, we will torch them. And they are an outstanding defense, but that's how much I like where our offense is now. Only game we lost, our Oline was manhandled. Our O-line vs Their dline is what will determine this outcome imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WeAre12 Newbie

WeAre12

Posted
Posted

Lynch has been a non-factor all season, even when he was healthy. A revamped O-line made up of cast-offs, converted D-linemen, and a prayer, cast the entire team into chaos for the first half of the season. They have gotten better and that combined w/the fact that your defensive ends are not cause for concern is a real red flag for you guys. You've got some great linebackers and d-backs but those ends are going to be your downfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

Everybody gave Wilson problems in the first half, that stat has been reversed.

Normally I'd say our DE's aren't anything to worry about, but a week off is huge for them Especially Allen. I hope you eat a bag of poo with your crow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...