Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Divisional Playoff Thread - Seahawks at Panthers


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Lords0fPain said:

even Cam said they were conservative...fugging coaches nearly cost us...again

That was beautiful. 

"You(r coaches) said you weren't going to be conservative."

(Cam) "We WERE conservative."

Tell the fugging truth Cam. Your coaches didnt trust you (or Olsen or Stew or Tolbert or Cotchery etc.) to win this game.

Telling the truth lets us know you understood what happened and how YOUR head coach took the ball right out of your hands.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ickmule said:

If you enjoyed that $hit you need to take off your rose colored glasses.  Play like that against an Arizona team and it will be a blowout for them. This coaching staff learns nothing from giving up big leads. 

Then you can Piss right off as a fan.  We're not the 2012ers and we should be able to enjoy our first appearance in a NFC championship game since 2005.  The coaches got us here, and yes they dropped the ball in the second half, but they did get us to 16-1 so I'll hedge my bets on the fact that they will get the mistakes corrected.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug you 12th man, wipe your ass with those flags! fug the rest of the nfl fans who doubted us. fug all the 1 and done motherfugers.
fug all the analysts that picked against us
Josh Katzowitz >fug you
Vinnie Lyer >fug you
Jarrett Bell>fug you
Kevin Patra>fug you
Tim Ryan>fug you
Geoff Ulrich>fug you
Lorenzo Reyes>fug you
Mark Malone>fug you
Gary Davenport>fug you
Nate Davis>fug you
Brad Gagnon>fug you
Chris Wesseling>fug you
KC Joyner >fug you
Kurt Warner>fug you (esp saying we wouldnt even get 100 rush yds)
Mike Clay>fug you
Danny Kelly>fug you
James Lofton >fug you
Khaled Elsayed>fug you
Mike FLorio>fug you
Jason La Confora>fug you
Mike Middlehurst-Schwartz>fug you
Boomer Esiason>fug you
Rick Drummon>fug you
John Breech>fug you
Neil Greenburg>fug you
Sam Monson>fug you
Steve Mariucci>fug you
Ryan Van Bibber>fug you
Arif Hasan>fug you
Jeff Dooley>fug you
Mario Mergola>fug you
James Parziale>fug you
Ross Jones>fug you
Tony Boselli>fug you
Tim Cowlishaw>fug you
Eric Allen>fug you
Ben Stockwell>fug you
Peter Schrager>fug you
Marshall Faulk>fug you
Craig Miller>fug you
Joel Thorman>fug you
Mike Golic>fug you
Nathan Jahnke>fug you
Conor Orr>fug you

Arizona you are next!
Time for my victory slurpee
‪#‎keeppounding‬, this is our year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

Then you can Piss right off as a fan.  We're not the 2012ers and we should be able to enjoy our first appearance in a NFC championship game since 2005.  The coaches got us here, and yes they dropped the ball in the second half, but they did get us to 16-1 so I'll hedge my bets on the fact that they will get the mistakes corrected.

And they didn't drop the ball even. Bask in Terry and Howie Cringing. Enjoy the win. Ha Ha Ha. 

 


 

 

Keep Pounding.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Cam said it...

"We were conservative, but you have to trust the coaching."

Not sure about trusting a coaching decision to go conservative against a desperate Seahawks team for an entire half. Panthers won so coaches won on their tactical move of limiting key players, running clock, and keeping other players healthy for next week.

I would not make that decision, but it has been a staple of the coaching all season. Packers, Colts, Giants, and now Seahawks. I am sure I am missing a game or two that the coaches spent at least an entire quarter putting the team into clock running mode. Panthers could bury any of those teams if the coaches stay out of Cam's and Luke's way.

I don't know what to think.

he had no choice but to add in "you HAVE to trust the coaching" or he would be under fire...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, !stUp said:

Who the "F" would you have coaching this team slick?

A coach that does not play not to lose...it doesn't matter because Richardson would not pay a coach like Billicheat, Carroll, etc. If you are just happy we won, after giving 24 UNANSWERED points and it comes down to an onsides kick recovery to keep from losing the game...well...what can anyone say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL I just watched an example of the best clock management in the second half that I've ever seen and people are bitching.

We took zero risk on the offensive side and stayed in cover 3 and cover 2 for 30 minutes.  A high school team could have put up 10 in that half and it was all by design.

So Cardinals have one half of game tape they can watch to prepare for us unless they want to go back to early December.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lords0fPain said:

A coach that does not play not to lose...it doesn't matter because Richardson would not pay a coach like Billicheat, Carroll, etc. If you are just happy we won, after giving 24 UNANSWERED points and it comes down to an onsides kick recovery to keep from losing the game...well...what can anyone say?

1145798-941670_937204_facepalm_implied_s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lords0fPain said:

A coach that does not play not to lose...it doesn't matter because Richardson would not pay a coach like Billicheat, Carroll, etc. If you are just happy we won, after giving 24 UNANSWERED points and it comes down to an onsides kick recovery to keep from losing the game...well...what can anyone say?

Well Carroll allowed us to have 31 unanswered points...why is he given a pass?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...