Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No team will hire Shula after that playcalling and Panthers won't release him after he ran the #1 scoring offense


megadeth078

Recommended Posts

how about our second year defensive end making a one handed pick in the super bowl (after sitting most of the year year behind charles johnson lol) only for us to to do absolutely nothing with it

 

correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that was the drive where we started out with a first down run into the middle of the defense for no yardage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Growl said:

As I said the other day, there is no funnier-nor sadder-element to this than the following:

 

Mike Shula actively went into this game trying to play the kind of game Denver wanted. A quick, low scoring games with few offensive plays. I don't even think we went to tempo  at any point, despite it's success this year against tough defenses and us being down two scores. You wanna slow down a nasty edge rush? How about speeding up the entire offense rather than running straight into a talented 9 man front over and over and over again like some junkie beating his head against a wall trying to get the talking octopi out of his head.

the man is stubborn and it cost us the Super Bowl.

 

 

 

As Denver stated after the Superbowl..the same plays we ran were all in the film they watched..they weren't surprise at anything ran..it was predictable and pretty much the game handed to them..Shula thought he could run the same game plan and Denver wouldnt be able to stop Carolina..that is more of an arrogance issue than preparation for the biggest stage of the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PhillyB said:

still not sure how shula is getting the burn for all this. running those plays up the gut is precisely how you negate crashing ends.

"we kept running long developing routes" is a myth and a reflexive holdover from the first half of 2014. we ran a ton of short stuff and just didn't connect on it, or ended up with turnovers at absolutely horrible times.

take away cam's pick (teddy's fault) and tolbert's second fumble and i think we win this game.

I watched the game again last night and I have to ultimately agree with you.  

The classic way to stop an aggressive edge pass rush is to run the ball up the middle or off tackle....my wife asked me why we kept running and my response was to make Denver slow the rush down and respect some aspect of our run game.

I also did see more short routes on my second watch than I did live.  Cam missed a couple of these with poor passes (possibly due to the pressure) and missed some open men due to the pressure.

The turnovers killed us and not taking advantage of good starting field position on two occasions hurt our chances too.

I will say though, Shula along with the o-line coordinator should have made some adjustments in the protection scheme even if it was simply telling Stewie, Tolbert, Dickson, Olsen, et. al. to stay on their assigned block (I know, easier said than done).  Also, I think you at least try a couple of screens and quick slants to start the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Statistically the best defense always beats a best offense. We hit the same roadblock that a lot of other teams have. I think if we were tougher and more physical out of the gate like we were against Arizona and Seattle previously, we would have had a better chance. Maybe it was just me but we didn't seem sharp out there or with it. Maybe next year but we need to learn to keep our personalities and focus in big games, especially the biggest game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

(followed, I think, by that stupid trick play that Mike no doubt spent the entire bye week drawing up)

If you're going to call that play then you call it on first down. And not one damn screen called against a defense sending everybody on every play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We did nothing Sunday that we had been doing all year. Even with our mistakes, we were still in it midway through the 4th. Yet Shula kept calling the same dumbass plays. He didn't help Cam at all. No short routes. Hardly any slants or screens. The offense looked exactly like 2014. He took total control of it. Yes he is on top of the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Shula absolutely was trash.  No excuses guys.  Two weeks to prepare and we looked out of it.  I know Denver is a beast, I know you can't stop them all the time, but we looked unprepared.  As others said, he continued to put this offense in 2nd and long against the #1 defense.   I seen hardly any slants.  We should have been running more of those to keep their defense honest.  This looked like a John Fox team out there.   

If memory serves, we ran 2 slants, both of which worked to perfection.  And (if memory serves yet again), we ran ZERO screens to the RBs.

 

Quote

I really think Shula took Cam's ability to change things away from him for this game.  Something was really off.  I actually think we should have ran Cam more than we did, for once, being the Super Bowl and all. 

To support this point, its incredibly difficult for a QB to scan the defense pre-snap and change a play when the offense isn't getting to the line until there's about 7 seconds left on the play clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

why the absolute fug would you want to get rid of the OC who orchestrated the #1 offense with mediocre receivers? what part of #1 offense in the league is hard to understand? there isn't one better. his offense was #1. jeebus.

Because he didn't orchestrate that. Sunday proved it. He took control and the offense went back a full year. Looked nothing like this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

To support this point, its incredibly difficult for a QB to scan the defense pre-snap and change a play when the offense isn't getting to the line until there's about 7 seconds left on the play clock.

And, to follow up on this (and, yes, I just quoted myself), coming to the line with very little time on the play clock just made it easier on Miller and Ware to get their damn head-start on their pass rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

And, to follow up on this (and, yes, I just quoted myself), coming to the line with very little time on the play clock just made it easier on Miller and Ware to get their damn head-start on their pass rush.

Yes, I noticed that live during the game.  There was a good chunk where we were very rushed on the play to beat the clock, and of course the one delay of game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is how I see it: Hendrickson is 4-5 years past the normal prime for an edge rusher.  However, the smart, elite edge rushers can play into their 30s.  So we would be taking a risk against the odds.  I see him as an elite, smart player,  but in 2025, he only played an average of 15 snaps per game.   We'd be paying him about 1.5 million per game, or $100,000 per snap at that rate. Hendrickson is 270, which makes him a guy who can rush inside or outside, hold the edge, and thus, be productive vs. the pass or run.   We have 2 guys (Scourton and Jones II) who do that pretty well.  Jones' salary is $10m.   I see our need as a pass-rushing specialist, hoping that Princely picks up that role rotationally at least, in 2026. Here is what AI says about age, and it does not lie: An NFL edge rusher's prime typically falls between ages 24 and 28, with peak production often seen around 27, though elite players maintain high production into their early 30s, with some legends excelling even later, demonstrating that while decline can start, great pass rushers defy age norms and can sustain elite play.  Peak Production Trends Early 20s (21-23): Players develop, with younger cohorts showing less immediate impact, but 23-year-olds often show significant pressure generation. Mid-to-Late 20s (24-28): This is the sweet spot, with the 27-year-old age group frequently leading the league in pressures and elite seasons occurring in this window. Early 30s (30+): While some decline begins, many top edge rushers remain highly effective, with stars like T.J. Watt and Myles Garrett demonstrating exceptional play well past 30, defying the average career trajectory.  Key Factors Physicality & Technique: Edge rushers need strength and speed, but mastery of pass-rush moves often develops later, allowing for sustained success. Individual Variation: Elite players like Bruce Smith and T.J. Watt show that exceptional talent and health can extend prime years significantly, with some even having more sacks after 30 than before. 
    • I just watched several nfl players break it down and this is NOT the case DJ was running a 20 yard out breaking crosser, he was supposed to flatten that route out.
    • Remember how we fired a coach for continuously taking us to the playoffs, but falling short of the Super Bowl?  No? Me either.
×
×
  • Create New...