Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gauging Josh Norman's contract value


panther4life

Recommended Posts

 
 
PLAYER
POS
TEAM
AGE
YRS
DOLLARS
AVERAGE
G'TEED
% G'TEED
FREE AGENT
Darrelle Revis (2015-2019) CB NYJ 30 5 $70,121,060 $14,024,212 $39,000,000 55.62% 2020
Patrick Peterson (2016-2020) CB ARI 25 5 $70,050,000 $14,010,000 $47,368,114 67.62% 2021
Joe Haden (2015-2019) CB CLE 26 5 $67,500,000 $13,500,000 $22,678,193 33.60% 2020
Byron Maxwell (2015-2020) CB PHI 28 6 $63,000,000 $10,500,000 $25,000,000 39.68% 2021
Aqib Talib (2014-2019) CB DEN 30 6 $57,000,000 $9,500,000 $25,500,000 44.74% 2020
Richard Sherman (2014-2018) CB SEA 27 4 $56,000,000 $14,000,000 $40,000,000 71.43% 2019
Brandon Carr (2012-2017) CB DAL 29 5 $50,100,000 $10,020,000 $26,500,000 52.89% 2018
Jason McCourty (2012-2017) CB TEN 28 6 $43,040,000 $7,173,333 $17,000,000 39.50% 2018
Chris Harris (2015-2019) CB DEN 26 5 $42,500,000 $8,500,000 $24,000,000 56.47% 2020
 

All of these comps come from http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/contracts/cornerback/

  • Revis currently has the highest per year average of just over 14 million per year with Patrick Peterson and Richard sherman barley behind him.
  • Peterson leads the way with guaranteed money, right at 47 million.
  • Sherman has the highest percentage guaranteed at 71.43%
  • Revis was the oldest at time of signing (29), Talib was 28 and Maxwell was 27.

 

Norman was excellent and 1 of the best corners in the game last year.Norman does not have enough proven success to reset the whole market, so it should be safe to assume a deal can be worked out for less than Revis' per year average.

He is better than Byron Maxwell and Jimmy Smith who are both getting over 10 million a year.

So that would put his long term market value of less than 14 million per year but more than 10 million a year. I would think a 4 year deal would satisfy both sides, or even 5 years on paper without the 5th year being voidable.

Norman already stands to gain 14 million Guaranteed for this year under the franchise tag. He will be a year older but a good year will pretty much secure him this amount again with another team if not here in 2017. On the flipside there is injury risk as well, in addition to being a year older next year.

Based on this information I think a reasonable deal both sides could live with would be something like

5 Years 61 million (12.2 Million per year average). With 31 million guaranteed. (15 Million signing bonus, with first 2 years salaries fully guaranteed)

* The signing bonus can be spread over 5 years. If at any point we chose to cut Norman after the 17 season, we would be on the hook for any prorated signing bonus not accounted for against the cap (the recurring 3 million) but not the base salary. 

Contract breakdown of 

2016 Base Salary: 7.75 Million(fully guaranteed), prorated bonus: 3 million = 10.75 Cap

2017 Base salary: 7.75 Million(fully guaranteed), prorated bonus: 3 million = 10.75 Cap hit

2018 Base salary: 8.25 Million, prorated bonus: 3 million                              = 11.25M Cap hit

2019 Base salary: 9.25 Million, prorated bonus: 3 million                             = 12.25M Cap hit

2020 Base salary: 12 Million, prorated bonus: 3 million**voidable year       = 3M Cap hit. 

Compared to the recent contracts above

  • This would rank norman 4th in guaranteed money for a corner
  • 5th in overall total contract value
  • 3rd in guaranteed percentage (57%)

1 Year franchise tag will guarantee Norman $13.952 Million . If we tagged him again the following season, he would be a due a 120% raise raising the tag to 16.74 Million. Adding those 2 numbers together alone equal just over 30.5 Million. Under this proposed contract we could have Norman for 4 years 45 million cap hit(11.25 yearly average), plus an additional 3 million in dead money in 2020. 

Does something like this seem like a fair deal for both sides? Would you be happy with a contract similar to this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moose taught me a little bit about contract years.  His next best year would be when contract was up.

I truly believe Norman is a product of our defensive system!!  The pressure we get from the front 4 gives little time for QB's to set and throw.  Our front 7 can cover a multitude of flaws in DB"s.

That being said, he seems to have no feeling for the team that saw promise in him and gave him chance.  If he can't be happy at 10 mil. a year then go to another team.  Just ask Ginn how that turned out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Tag doesn't set the floor. Usually a tagged player signs for less per year than the value of the tag. I think $12mil a year is good for both sides. Long term security for him and plenty of money and the respect of being one of the highest paid CBs. 

Historically, it does set the floor. The majority of players tagged that sign a long term deal before the year get more than the franchise tag on an APY basis. No one takes demonstrably less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bartin said:

Norman's agent would just hang up the phone if you offered him that. Gettleman would sign that deal yesterday. They will be looking for at least 14 million APY. The tag sets the floor.

I think players will take somewhat less than the tag if they get a big signing bonus and guaranteed money of 50% of the whole deal on a 4 year deal. After all they trade a few million a year for a guaranteed long term deal which protects them if they get injured which is a real possibility for all players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be a little pissed with 5 years, 62-67 mil with idk 38-45 mil guaranteed but I'd shut up and be happy to have J-No for five more seasons. If we keep him, the deal will likely be in that range. I don't see why not just sign him instead of tagging him. If we were to give him a contract where he was getting paid the tag money yearly, it would be 5 years 67 mil. If Getts could talk him into maybe knocking a few mil off here or there for the good of the team, we could get one of the premier corners in the league locked down for a high price, but slightly less than other full-retard non-Getts teams would. I hope J-No loves us as much as he says he does, because someone is going to offer him 85 million dollars. Mark my words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Catweisers said:

Moose taught me a little bit about contract years.  His next best year would be when contract was up.

I truly believe Norman is a product of our defensive system!!  The pressure we get from the front 4 gives little time for QB's to set and throw.  Our front 7 can cover a multitude of flaws in DB"s.

That being said, he seems to have no feeling for the team that saw promise in him and gave him chance.  If he can't be happy at 10 mil. a year then go to another team.  Just ask Ginn how that turned out.

I think you're giving the front 4 more credit then most would. The Panther's have been more successful blitzing then not blitzing over the past 2 seasons when it comes to pass rushing productivity. 10.5 of teams 44 sacks came from back 7, numerous other sacks came from blitzes that pushed QB's up. The back 7 had 20+ hurries as well this past season. 

 

Since we know he turned down over 7 million last off season and word is the team and agent aren't even close and talks haven't helped so far. It's a good bet he's asking for top NFL CB money right now and with 1.5 seasons as arguably the NFL's top CB...he has that right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...