Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

13 million under cap after Norman?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, KB_fan said:

Question:  What cap implications are there to locking up a contract with Short this offseason?  I've still not really done research to understand how NFL contracts work. 

Given that Short still has one more year under contract, if he were to sign an extension for a pretty major contract (10 mil+ per year) now, is it possible to defer that cap hit until 2017, or does that money need to be available in our cap for this season?

The way it works to sign a guy on a rookie deal with a year left is that it would be an extension. The base salary will stay the same in 2016, but you give them a huge bonus which is prorated over the next 5 years. Short has a $1.5M base so say we gave him a $30M signing bonus then a fifth of that would hit the cap this year for a total cap hit of $7.5M. The big base salaries would start in 2017 so the large cap hits would still be a year away. You can also use a guaranteed 2017 roster bonus that you convert into signing bonus to further spread out the cap hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly l doubt we will make much of a splash. CJ while over paid is probably better than Williams at this point and Williams is not going to come cheap with Vernon tagged. I would like to see us pick up a CB but there will be other teams with twice our money over paying. My hope is we bring in a TE or some depth at OL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Thanks @Bartin for all the helpful replies today about contracts.  Learned alot.  Much appreciate the time you've taken to explain how KK & Star's contracts might work and affect the cap.

No problem. The more that people know about how contracts and the salary cap work, the more constructive the conversation about them can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These replys give me hope. Some posters know how much the panthers truly have, not much after all the figuring.

 

So that means don't get upset when Dave's doesn't sign any big name during the first two weeks of free agency. Be more of the same form past years dollar store, bargin bin, and dumpster driving FYI!!!! Goos to save those pennies to resign KK, star, Kevin Benjamin, early, etc etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Snake said:

Honestly l doubt we will make much of a splash. CJ while over paid is probably better than Williams at this point and Williams is not going to come cheap with Vernon tagged. I would like to see us pick up a CB but there will be other teams with twice our money over paying. My hope is we bring in a TE or some depth at OL. 

Charles Johnson is not better than Mario Williams, come on man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...