Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Money or winning?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

There is an alternate scenario, and one that I think is more relevant to us in Carolina.

Sometimes young guys sign with a good team to "grow their brand" and get their name out there, figuring they can cash in after that.

It's happened more than once here in the last few years.

 

i'm hoping we get the best of both worlds.. and it looks like we might

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Keep in mind that injury could cut short your career at any time.  You're not technically guaranteed a "last few years".

Also worth remembering there are things like endorsements and visibility to consider. These things come much easier on a winning team.

Unless I am a 10 yr vet I am making as much money as possible....but would consider not chasing it to a Browns type situation. 

If I am young, maximizing the first two contracts is priority #1.   

 

 

Off topic...but I was thinking about Sam Bradford the other day.  Is there a player who has done less and been paid more than Bradford in recent years? Talk about cashing in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Unless I am a 10 yr vet I am making as much money as possible....but would consider not chasing it to a Browns type situation. 

If I am young, maximizing the first two contracts is priority #1.   

Off topic...but I was thinking about Sam Bradford the other day.  Is there a player who has done less and been paid more than Bradford in recent years? Talk about cashing in

Agree about Bradford.

And this kind of helps frame the question: a few million to play two or three seasons with the Patriots or several million to commit long term to the Cleveland Browns?

Many players who spent long years with losing organization would say the losing wears on you (Carson Palmer, for example).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I just don't understand being an NFL player and not going for a ring every season you play.

Realistically, we're discussing levels of money that most of us will never see.

As someone else mentioned, our perspective may be a little skewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

A big pile of money isn't worth going somewhere like the Browns or Dolphins. 

Some players, though, play mostly for the paycheck and will stop giving all their effort once they hit the big payday. Best to steer clear.

How much money is worth being miserable in your job every day for years?

That's the operative question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm an above average NFL player, I have to consider the Money to Winning Ratio.

If a bottom dweller offers more more than 30% (or something) than a winner, I have to very strong assess how "winning" that team will be.  Also, the better teams don't tend to pay out the ear for guys as opposed to cap flush teams who haven't sniffed 10 wins in 5+ years.

Like If Jacksonville offered me $20 million, but Carolina/NE/AZ/Seattle offered me $12, I think I'd go for the Jags.  $8 million is a LOT of money...it's hard to turn that down.  Now if the winner comes back at $16 million, it's an easier choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Agree about Bradford.

And this kind of helps frame the question: a few million to play two or three seasons with the Patriots or several million to commit long term to the Cleveland Browns?

Many players who spent long years with losing organization would say the losing wears on you (Carson Palmer, for example).

Long term? Cleveland? Not sure if they do that there. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...