Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers will target offense in round one


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Henry would be a star in the panthers offensive. Its a perfect fit. People was saying Benjamin was slow, drop to many passes, and would be a bust. He worked out perfectly in our system. Sometimes judging someone from a previous player is foolish. I trust our organization about making the right choice.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.si.com/nfl/2016/04/08/nfl-mock-draft-surprises-sleepers-laremy-tunsil

Doug Farrar - one of my favorite analysts, and one of the few national writers that clearly know the Panthers well - just mocked Derrick Henry to the Panthers.  For reference, he ranks Henry #24 overall. 

"O.K., enemy defenses—deal with this. You have Cam Newton, you have Jonathan Stewart and now, you have the 6' 3", 247-pound Heisman Trophy winner to deal with. That’s a backfield that will dole out a lot of pain, both mentally and physically. Henry is more agile than the average big back, but his primary attribute is his ability to just trash opposing front sevens with his downhill power. This is as perfect a scheme fit as there is in this class, and Henry could elevate himself to the Panthers’ lead dog sooner than later."

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On April 7, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Matt62881 said:

Which of the two henerys do you see falling further into the second giving us a better chance of trading up and nabbing him, I would love both! I really see us trading up a few times in the draft and snagging a small pool of gems.

I think Hunter will be grabbed in the first, dude is a baller and graded well, Derrick has been mocked in the early second.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like the idea of Hunter Henry studying under Olsen.. memories of Shockey/Olsen come to mind from Cam's rookie campaign..

Dickson has been solid for us but outside of the fumble-reach-around-recovery TD in Tampa1 and the side-arm-helmet-sideswipe-stick-um-grab TD in Tampa2 – Dickson hasn't been a big cog to our success by any means..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

We have enough players who can get yards running the ball on the ground 

we don't have enough players that can catch Cam touchdowns .. Cam has a lot more than 35 passing TD's in him, he needs guys who can catch them

What a shame that all we could manage was the number one offense in the league last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

What a shame that all we could manage was the number one offense in the league last year.

I think our weakness at WR showed up in a big way in the Super Bowl.  KB will help that but I think we still have a need at slot WR.

Cam is incredible, but that's no reason not to consider every possibility to make him more effective.

The pre draft interviews and workouts point to the front office being most interested in adding talent at WR, S, and DL (by volume of interviews).

It won't be some travesty if we don't add WR talent in the draft - we can be very successful with the guys we've got as last year proved.  But there is space on this offense for giving Cam more playmakers.

Edited by uscgamecocks
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

The best way I can put it is that .. giving Cam the offense as it is now is like putting a governor on a Ferrari

The best way we can put it.....The Falcons did this....the Colts keep doing this.....etc....A balanced, consistent team has a much better shot at a Lombardi than "the greatest show on turf" or the offensive heavy Colts of Manning's younger years.

You build this right, we can be competitive for 10 more years, not become a flash in the pan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

The best way we can put it.....The Falcons did this....the Colts keep doing this.....etc....A balanced, consistent team has a much better shot at a Lombardi than "the greatest show on turf" or the offensive heavy Colts of Manning's younger years.

You build this right, we can be competitive for 10 more years, not become a flash in the pan.

Why can't Gettleman be more like Ryan Grigson?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

So if we add a few weapons for our QB or just one great one for that matter, all of a sudden we will turn into the no defense Colts and just pass every down

Which weapons exactly?  Name them, explain how we get them, apply the contracts to our books, and let's have a grown up discussion.

I will start....I want to add a huge red zone threat to our receiving corps...not a rookie....maybe one that has shown that he can contribute on an NFL field, maybe one capable of 1000 yard seasons and multiple TD's without a real threat on the other side to help him out.

Now how on Earth do I find something like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...