Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dark Horse Pick: Shilique Calhoun

XClown1986

By XClown1986,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

XClown1986 Proficient

XClown1986

Posted
Posted

As we all know, Gettleman loves a good pass rusher. According to PFF, Calhoun was the best pass rusher in the FBS and it really wasn't debatable. He was average against the run, but really could gain about 10 pounds of muscle to help him in this area. 

All of us here agree that we need a DE and we hear names like Dodd and Ogbah being thrown around, but Calhoun is a guy that has gotten lost in the shuffle somehow. A year ago, if he had declared for the draft, he might have gone in the top 20. This season, it seems almost all pundits agree that he is a 2nd day prospect.

I think back to the selection of Shaq Thompson last year. Gettleman had Shaq as the top player on the board when we selected him in Round 1. It was universally agreed upon that not only was this pick a reach, but that it might have been a reach by 2 rounds. But it isn't about the analysts. It is about fit, player ability, and character. Calhoun checks off all of those boxes. He actually reminds me a bit of Osi Umenyiora (at least before the arrogance set in), and we all know where Osi played and where Gettleman worked during this time. 

I would not be AT ALL surprised to see Gettleman pull the trigger on Calhoun at 30, make everyone scratch their heads, and down the road look like a genius yet again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Rainmaker Newbie

The_Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

As we all know, Gettleman loves a good pass rusher. According to PFF, Calhoun was the best pass rusher in the FBS and it really wasn't debatable. He was average against the run, but really could gain about 10 pounds of muscle to help him in this area. 

All of us here agree that we need a DE and we hear names like Dodd and Ogbah being thrown around, but Calhoun is a guy that has gotten lost in the shuffle somehow. A year ago, if he had declared for the draft, he might have gone in the top 20. This season, it seems almost all pundits agree that he is a 2nd day prospect.

I think back to the selection of Shaq Thompson last year. Gettleman had Shaq as the top player on the board when we selected him in Round 1. It was universally agreed upon that not only was this pick a reach, but that it might have been a reach by 2 rounds. But it isn't about the analysts. It is about fit, player ability, and character. Calhoun checks off all of those boxes. He actually reminds me a bit of Osi Umenyiora (at least before the arrogance set in), and we all know where Osi played and where Gettleman worked during this time. 

I would not be AT ALL surprised to see Gettleman pull the trigger on Calhoun at 30, make everyone scratch their heads, and down the road look like a genius yet again. 

Dave doesn't draft based on need, A more likely darkhorse pick is on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted

He might fall in 3-4 OLB group that Gettleman talked about wanting other teams to draft in front of us so players that fit our scheme fall.

I'd be surprised if we draft at 250 lbs DE. Gettleman has historically targeted guys who fit the ideal height-weight prototype especially on the DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Rainmaker Newbie

The_Rainmaker

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

When need meets value according to the board, he does. It has been done with Star and Kelvin. It depends on how our board is set up.

Agree, but I beleive there will be a offensive player graded higher that meets the criteria of " need & value" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

When need meets value according to the board, he does. It has been done with Star and Kelvin. It depends on how our board is set up.

For most teams, positional need is factored into a players grade. For example, for us a DE would get a slight bump up the board and a LB would get a slight bump down the board and they amount they move up or down would reflect how big a need a certain position is. I have no clue if we do that or not, but many supposed pure BPA teams have admitted that they do that and could explain why our picks almost always seems to correspond with a need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bababoey Enthusiast

bababoey

Posted
Posted

Calhoun might be the best, yes the best, pure pass rusher in this draft.  Right now that is all he is.  He tries hard against the run but is just to little.  Most mocks have him anywhere from about 40 to the middle of the 3rd.  If you can get him to gain 15 to 20 lbs you have got a Demarcus Ware.  If he can't he is basically Mario Addison.  Ware is worth the 30th pick in the draft,  Addison is not.  It just depends on if the coaching staff fells like he can add 20lbs and keep that quickness and speed or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bababoey Enthusiast

bababoey

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

I haven't considered him at all for us.  He's not a 4-3 DE, he's a 3-4 OLB.  And why did he transfer...wasn't there some character issue?

Transfer ???  You sure you not thinking of Spence???  And he was a 4-3 DE and Michigan State.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...