Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Article on Josh Norman Over At Football Outsider*


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Nick_81 said:

Washington plays more man than zone as well, correct?

well, there base is coverage is Cover 3.  Late in the season they went to more man looks than they did early on but were still a zone D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PanthersBigD said:

I would love for Josh to have continued success. However I find it hard to believe he'll play well enough/long enough in Washington to justify 50MM guaranteed. 

Turns out to be only about 35 million guaranteed, but still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liked Norman..  wish him the best. He wanted to be a panther and it didn't happen.. I don't see the point in harping on his performance. I'd like to see him succeed.. if he doesn't... oh well hope he rebounds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think he will do great. i always felt that josh was limited by our scheme as far as being able to shut a guy down the whole game. all you had to do what send the reciever out of his zone or move him in the slot. 

 

i think its silly to undermine a great player for us. he was phenominal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Peppers90 NC said:

He uses his hands well at the LOS, re routing the WR meaning he only has to keep up for a couple seconds. Straight line speed is the most overrated attribute by casual fans.

Actually I think one of Norman's weakness is his inability to jam receivers at the line. He tried with OBJ but it just wasn't his game. Josh is a smart player and is perfect with zone because he cn recover so quickly and loves to be facing the quarterback.  He doesn't have flat speed but relies on his athleticism and timing to make plays. You could argue that poor technique or lack of speed put you into a situation where you had to make some kind of athletic play to bail yourself out. But still he was largely successful and important to our team.

The issue was if he routed players to the inside he didn't follow them. His zone was either halves, thirds or quarters without help on the deep routes many times. So only the guys going outside or guys coming from the slot to the outside were his responsibility.  Safeties and linebackers had the crossing routes unless Josh played off his man and read the quarterbacks eyes.

I am looking forward to see if he keeps developing and improving or struggles to live up to a monster contract. He has the media's attention in Washington he never would have here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there are many real fans of the team who hope Norman fails.  The article simply points out the holes in Norman's game that he hasn't been able to close up (or simply hasn't needed to).  In our zone game, Norman was the man.  But if he's asked to be a bump and run, man up guy, that doesn't really play to his strengths.

Norman is a really good player, he was great for us.  It's fair to say that Washington is going to have to use him properly to get value out of their investment.  If they line him up 1 on 1 all game, Norman is going to have a long game because he was never asked to do that for us.

I hope he does well, I really do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...