Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LeBatard: Building a Franchise in Salary Cap Sports Isn't Finding Great Players, It's Finding Great Value


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Losing Norman (which is the direction this thread has turned) is bad, but it is the same as Rivera said last year when KB went down, you don't replace the player (can't do it), you replace 73 catches and 9 TD's. that philosophy worked out just fine I'd say, and the secondary will work itself out as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

I love LeBatard Show and Highly Questionable.. it is a complete 180* from Colin Cowturd. LeBatard hates the vanilla of 'sports' and how it is typically done and discussed. he is anti-establishment and I love it.

I agree. I always thought Cowherd took the contrarian view just to be different. Stugotz cracks me up (and I don't know how ESPN lets him go by that nickname, though its hilarious).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Nah, you appear salty.  Hence your need to follow me in different threads and quite posts from other threads as if I was hiding from them.  Lol, saying someone is "showing what a hard ass they are," would fit under the category of human error.  Just for future reference.  And if those last words weren't coherent, you may want to find a tutor to help you with your remedial reading level.  Now, serve me up some more butthurt, hall monitor.

But saying something like that would indicate you know what's going on behind the scenes. And you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

But saying something like that would indicate you know what's going on behind the scenes. And you don't.

No, I'm on a message board and sharing my opinion, as most people here are.  I'm not stating it as fact.  It just so happens my opinion isn't popular, so people attack me for it.

I get tired of saying "i said," and "i already stated," so, ya'll can go read all the other posts to nitpick.  People are picking what they want and building strawmen out of nothing.  My opinion was inferring what was going on behind the scenes just as much as the crowd who claim with absolute 100% factual accuracy that Gettleman has never let his emotions influence a decision.  First off, I think it's absurd and laughably naive for anyone old enough to post on this board to think that, and second, Gettleman admitted to making such decisions.  I state that I think his ego affected negotiations and people go batshit defending him as infallible.

Some are mad because I'm not joining the fray and celebrating ever fuging move he makes.  When he makes a good one, i applaud it.  When i find it questionable, i say as much, and the majority don't want to hear that.  So be it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

*Denver is only team that made splash moves and worked out. Bc, they already had core guys that they drafted (Miller, Harris, Jackson, Dthomas, Danny, Marshall, Roby, Wolfe).

NE - Revis and Browner(LaFell wasn't exactly a big signing but was big during that season)

SEA - Bennett and Avril(Harvin too who even though he missed like the entire 2013 season was very good in the playoffs)

BAL - Anquan Boldin(traded for him for a 3rd and 4th)

NYG - Antrel Rolle

GB - Charles Woodson(though that was 4 years prior to their SB year)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

No, I'm on a message board and sharing my opinion, as most people here are.  I'm not stating it as fact.  It just so happens my opinion isn't popular, so people attack me for it.

I get tired of saying "i said," and "i already stated," so, ya'll can go read all the other posts to nitpick.  People are picking what they want and building strawmen out of nothing.  My opinion was inferring what was going on behind the scenes just as much as the crowd who claim with absolute 100% factual accuracy that Gettleman has never let his emotions influence a decision.  First off, I think it's absurd and laughably naive for anyone old enough to post on this board to think that, and second, Gettleman admitted to making such decisions.  I state that I think his ego affected negotiations and people go batshit defending him as infallible.

Some are mad because I'm not joining the fray and celebrating ever fuging move he makes.  When he makes a good one, i applaud it.  When i find it questionable, i say as much, and the majority don't want to hear that.  So be it...

Question. Would you feel this way about our GM if he had to let one of our DTs walk due to dropping 14 mil/year on Norman? Keeping our DL together is more important than keeping Norman IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be too shrewd about the lebatard opinion, but it's pretty redundant. I mean, of course it's about value. You can't put together a team that can compete without it.

But it's a lot more than just value at positions where you don't have super stars, you've got to have the right money going to the positions that matter the most and Dave has been great, signing Olsen, Cam, Luke and getting CJ's cap number down out of the stratosphere.

Im not willing to trade KK for Norman and it very well could have come down to that. I'm way more comfortable having 30-million spread out for KK, our rookies and 5 or 6 solid players at less valuable positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw...not to downplay Star, 'cause I'm sure he's being evaluated at every turn, to see what he really brings to the table and if we draft a DT in the first 3-rounds, the writing may be on the wall for him or even KK for that matter, just depends on which player is truly the anchor on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

No, I'm on a message board and sharing my opinion, as most people here are.  I'm not stating it as fact.  It just so happens my opinion isn't popular, so people attack me for it.

I get tired of saying "i said," and "i already stated," so, ya'll can go read all the other posts to nitpick.  People are picking what they want and building strawmen out of nothing.  My opinion was inferring what was going on behind the scenes just as much as the crowd who claim with absolute 100% factual accuracy that Gettleman has never let his emotions influence a decision.  First off, I think it's absurd and laughably naive for anyone old enough to post on this board to think that, and second, Gettleman admitted to making such decisions.  I state that I think his ego affected negotiations and people go batshit defending him as infallible.

Some are mad because I'm not joining the fray and celebrating ever fuging move he makes.  When he makes a good one, i applaud it.  When i find it questionable, i say as much, and the majority don't want to hear that.  So be it...

Ask yourself this: Why are people supporting him?

The answer is simple: Because under Gettleman we've had more success than at any other time in this franchise history.

And why is that? Because he makes the right moves way more often than he does the wrong ones. And that's included letting go of popular players that led to a lot of screaming and crying.

Frankly, just because you can't separate your emotions from a business decision doesn't mean others can't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Ask yourself this: Why are people supporting him?

The answer is simple: Because under Gettleman we've had more success than at any other time in this franchise history.

And why is that? Because he makes the right moves way more often than he does the wrong ones. And that's included letting go of popular players that led to a lot of screaming and crying.

Frankly, just because you can't separate your emotions from a business decision doesn't mean others can't. 

Gettleman didn't make the Smitty and Josh situations personal. It's the fans getting pissed about them who did. I love Smitty and Josh and do wish we could've come to terms with them to stay here, but it's a business and the moves were necessary. I don't let the business of the NFL affect me as a fan. It's pretty sad to see how Patriots fans have responded to Brady's suspension coming back, and how they actually tried to sue the NFL and pay the fine for Kraft. Just plain silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Right. Shame both of them hate Cam.

what r u talkin bout? Lebatard loves Cam.. he was the only one defending him for the press conference fiasco

He loves anyone who says something 'real' and not the cliche ridden statements our coaches, players and talking heads give at every turn.. have you heard his segment where he has a mash-up of the most useless statements of the week - or Stugotz game notes.. its so terrible its hilarious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...