Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Funchess Reminder


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

I didn't say Garrett would beat him out, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. Funchess is a tweener who couldn't beat out Cotchery, I think Garrett fits our offense better.

Quick question.  How is Funchess (6'4"/225 lbs.) a tweener, and Garrett (6'3"/220 lbs.) isn't?  Because he played TE some in college?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

Quick question.  How is Funchess (6'4"/225 lbs.) a tweener, and Garrett (6'3"/220 lbs.) isn't?  Because he played TE some in college?

Because that dude is clueless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

Quick question.  How is Funchess (6'4"/225 lbs.) a tweener, and Garrett (6'3"/220 lbs.) isn't?  Because he played TE some in college?

Funchess came in at 235 and never played WR in college until his last season. Garrett is more of a true outside threat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Funchess came in at 235 and never played WR in college until his last season. Garrett is more of a true outside threat.

 

I feel bad for the kid, because he's never had the body type of a TE tbh.  He's built long and lean, like you'd want a WR.  Michigan did him no favors during his career.  

Anyway, after reading the SI article on Garrett, he may will his way to surprise people.  I'm cheering him on.  You have to respect the work ethic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

400+ yards as the number 2 WR while getting 700 snaps is above average? 

 

I I didn't say Garrett would beat him out, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. Funchess is a tweener who couldn't beat out Cotchery, I think Garrett fits our offense better.

You definitely are consistent if nothing else.  However, the sad part is that you are consistently wrong, embarrassing, and ignorant.  Well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Philly if I recall was the least productive number 2 WR in the entire NFL. I don't understand the love affair? there were games last season were he disappeared, he didn't have one game with over 100 yards receiving the entire regular season.  

 

I wouldn't be be one bit suprise if Garrett beats out both Philly and Funchess.

Wow. 

Are you a real life person?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MadHatter said:

You definitely are consistent if nothing else.  However, the sad part is that you are consistently wrong, embarrassing, and ignorant.  Well done.

So you think Philly is above average? LOL

 

I feel sorry for you, how many subjects have you flip flopped on today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...