Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peanut Tillman hired already...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

A relief.  Tired of watching these former players with no class on NFL shows.  Sapp, Deon Sanders, Michael Irvin etc.  I also hate some with no personality--I hated marino, Boomer E, and Heath Evans is a jerk.  Just my opinion.

Peanut is a great choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

A Panther friendly face on a national pregame show?

I'm good with that.

dont get me wrong, I'm happy to have him in our corner and another intelligent person at the table. I just found it to be a purposely targeted headline to get our hopes up and then yank the carpet out. So in kind I shall return a playful jab to the "almighty Zod"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been listening to him do things here and there on XM radio all summer and he will be a great addition that I'm looking forward to.

One, small, personal piece of advice Penut...i would experiment with the hairstyle. We're getting older bro and it doesn't stop moving south. Go with the short high fade, it will look tight. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...