Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This TE thing kind of bothers me


top dawg

Recommended Posts

The TE position is one of the most difficult to learn, if you want to model yourself after Greg Olsen.  He knows where he needs to be, and where everyone is supposed to be as well.  I know that we have some smart guys at the position, so I can only assume that the it's just going to take a while before the light bulbs are fully lit. The thing is though, why does it seem like the position just virtually disappears from a pass-catching standpoint when Olsen is out of the game? I know that the young TE's heads are still spinning to a degree, but the coaches just don't seem to be integrating them into the game offensively.  Other than an errant pass to Simonson in fairly blanketed coverage, I haven't heard anyone's name other than Marcus Lucas.  Considering that Dickson basically disappeared last year but for a heads-up tip, I don't like how disjointed the TE game appears to be in the flow of the offense when Olsen is out with a single TE, much less two TE sets (the dream of many).

Are my expectations too high? Is that part of our offensive attack pretty much screwed if Olsen is out for any appreciable amount of time? What's the TE disappearing act about? I don't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were clearly trying to evaluate WR talent today, so I wouldn't put much stock in TE action. Regarding other non-preseason games, Greg is head and shoulders above any other TE on the roster when it comes to the passing game. If he goes out, the game plan probably adjusts accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure he won't, but I'd like for Lucas to make it over these other guys.

Give me the guy with soft hands, that's gets open, and teach him how to block. He has dedicated to adding weight over the last couple seasons so I'm sure he is working on the physicality of the position.

Simonson? Meh. Great if you want a 5 yard catch. He isn't a good blocker either.

Sandland? Practice squad. Raw.

Deaver? Who knows. Just seems like JAG.

I know Lucas is doing this against 2nd and 3rds, but the others aren't doing anything in the passing game...period...against anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And after game three, I feel even more concerned with the status of our TE situation. Dickson was in, which should have made  at least a marked difference, but it really didn't. Sure it could have had he caught that critical pass, but bottom line, he didn't. After Olsen, we are pretty much screwed. Other than Can, he is our most critical player on offense. Sure it was a preseason game with vanilla play calling, but do we really want to compensate with only our receivers in case Olsen is out for any appreciable amount of time? The rooks are obviously not ready, and Dickson is a liability blocking and catching. Why not give Mucas Dickson's spot? At least he can catch. And I swear it seems like he's a better route runner also, but admittedly it may be a case of the-backup-is-always-better.

Oh, damn! I forgot about Simonson. How surprising?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, csx said:

Was it a concern prior to this season? Nothing has changed but a few more young guys in the competition.

Yeah, but I have higher expectations now. Plus, last time this year I could fool myself that Dickson was a half-way replacement for Olsen, believing "He can do half, right?" After last season, I no longer have any such delusion. He's not even a half-ass replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

And after game three, I feel even more concerned with the status of our TE situation. Dickson was in, which should have made  at least a marked difference, but it really didn't. Sure it could have had he caught that critical pass, but bottom line, he didn't. After Olsen, we are pretty much screwed. Other than Can, he is our most critical player on offense. Sure it was a preseason game with vanilla play calling, but do we really want to compensate with only our receivers in case Olsen is out for any appreciable amount of time? The rooks are obviously not ready, and Dickson is a liability blocking and catching. Why not give Mucas Dickson's spot? At least he can catch. And I swear it seems like he's a better route runner also, but admittedly it may be a case of the-backup-is-always-better.

I wouldn't say screwed and I am down on Dickson but I am reminded of the great plays he made last season, specifically this one when Greg was out for a brief period during the ATL home game (I was at that game, what an incredible play to watch live and also very scary when Greg went down, the stadium was completely silent and it looked like Cam was having a panic attack watching Greg roll around on the ground)

image.gifSo I'm a little optimistic that if Dickson wins the #2 we will be ok with him. If Olsen goes down we're fuged anyway just like many other teams if they lost their top tight end. im not sure who we could pick up at this point that would be an upgrade, but it's something to watch going forward in later years in the draft. Maybe sandland becomes the answer eventually? Don't know or maybe we should draft a TE high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, csx said:

It shouldn't be a huge shock that a 7th rounder and an UDFA might take some time and might not work out.

That's not a shock, but them doing basically absolutely nothing in these games is concerning. But of course, I already stated that things will take time with them, and they are not ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...