Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL execs compare Colin Kaepernick to Rae Carruth


Cookie Lyon

Recommended Posts

This is truly insane to compare Kaepernick to a guy that paid a hitman to murder his pregnant girlfriend. 

They called him a traitor and another executive also vowed to resign if the owner of the team asked him to sign Kaepernick. What a sick world we live in.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2651681-mike-freemans-10-point-stance-kaepernick-anger-intense-in-nfl-front-offices

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the media is doing there thing....where they paint a world we don't actually live in.  I hate the we polled 20 people and let's listen to the one crazy guy to set the tone despite the other 19 being normal humans current media. 

But as an employer getting ready for a season and looking in that vacuum it is understandable why a team wouldn't want him.  They want to play a football season not deal with a Tebowesqe circus of it came to that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Completely fabricated by BR. 

I'm not a big BR fan, but to be fair the article doesn't actually say what the thread title says it does.

Here's the Rae Carruth reference in full:

All seven estimated 90 to 95 percent of NFL front offices felt the same way they did. One executive said he hasn't seen this much collective dislike among front office members regarding a player since Rae Carruth. Remember Rae Carruth? He's still in prison for the plot to murderhis pregnant girlfriend.

So what the executive actually said was that he hasn't seen someone this universally disliked since Rae Carruth.

That's not the same as saying Colin Kaepernick is just as bad as Rae Carruth.

People are still free to criticize the executives stance on Kaepernick, of course, but it makes more sense to criticize then for something they actually said.

The thread title here isn't truly accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not a big BR fan, but to be fair the article doesn't actually say what the thread title says it does.

Here's the Rae Carruth reference in full:

 

 

So what the executive actually said was that he hasn't seen someone this universally disliked since Rae Carruth.

That's not the same as saying Colin Kaepernick is just as bad as Rae Carruth.

People are still free to criticize the executives stance on Kaepernick, of course, but it makes more sense to criticize then for something they actually said.

The thread title here isn't truly accurate.

Its a Bullshit artical regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...