Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Voth: what went wrong in the first half?


uncfan888

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Cmon now. Everyone knows it was all due to.poor coaching and Shula. The players were perfect because even if they make mistakes it is still the coaches fault for not anticipating the future and planning for it in advance. The players can't help it. 

Exactly.  Like I said before penalties, turnovers and special teams are costing us games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn I hate the look on that safety. Had Dickson open short and didn't throw it his way. The other part that seems to confuse me is that it looks like Cam was looking the way of the defender when he got past Oher and he still hung on to the ball. I guess he was expecting Norwell to pick up the block but that is an incredibly dangerous decision while in the end zone.

Oh yeah and on the Funchess drop we had a guy open short on the right that looks like he might have given us a 1st down. Given Funch should have made that catch but the other option looks to be an easy 1st. Meh, oh well HOPEFULLY they will view all this stuff, learn from it, and fix these issues going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn I hate the look on that safety. Had Dickson open short and didn't throw it his way. The other part that seems to confuse me is that it looks like Cam was looking the way of the defender when he got past Oher and he still hung on to the ball. I guess he was expecting Norwell to pick up the block but that is an incredibly dangerous decision while in the end zone.




I noticed this as well, it seems he's looking to the left as well, I don't understand what was going through his head to where he doesn't see the Linemen coming and also doesn't see Dickson. Oh well. Keep Pounding.


Being the chunky guy with the hot girlfriend since '93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first half was a prime example of what can happen when you let a good team hang in there.  Should have been at least a 3 score game after the first.   The offense is its own worst enemy right now.  

This team has been a tale of two halves for a while now (that is almost 100% coaching); it just seems that they typically get up enough points so when the 2nd half collapse comes they can squeak it out.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...