Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report claims NFL officials don’t view Cam Newton as ‘real quarterback’


Allaine

Recommended Posts

Interesting how everywhere you look people are wondering why Cam (not Ron Rivera) has to be the one to speak up, and basically call out the refs for something to finally get done.

With this in mind, I'm thinking a little bit more about what Steve Smith said about Rivera hiding out in his office when he was released.

For all the talk about Ron being a players coach, it makes you wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Interesting how everywhere you look people are wondering why Cam (not Ron Rivera) has to be the one to speak up, and basically call out the refs for something to finally get done.

With this in mind, I'm thinking a little bit more about what Steve Smith said about Rivera hiding out in his office when he was released.

For all the talk about Ron being a players coach, it makes you wonder.

Do you think the players a lying when they say Rivera is  fixture in the locker room ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They hit the nail on the head about it should be Rivera.  Just another reason for people to deflect when Cam does it....like today Skip said Cam keeps complaining (when in fact it was the first time he ever complained off the field).

Jimbo Fisher in college just handled it correctly.  Coaches shouldn't be backing up the QB they should lead the charge 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 15 said:

I can't wait for the ESPN 30 for 30 that comes out one day when Cam is a retired HOFer and tells the story of the adversity he went through on his way to completely transcending the QB position. 

Idk if one 30 for 30 Will be enough to cover all the poo Cam has been put through between college and NFL, not to mention what's left in his career. I've had this God awful feeling for a couple years now that it won't be a good parting of ways with the organization whenever that time comes. Hope I'm wrong  and I really shouldn't even be looking that far ahead but I just feel as if he's never gonna get what he deserves for whatever reason 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, csx said:

Do you think the players a lying when they say Rivera is  fixture in the locker room ?

Where did I say he wasn't?

But we aren't talking about just within the locker room. Which is basically my point. And I'm not saying he simply doesn't care or something. Just that public perception perhaps outweighs certain things. That probably comes down from ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the full report that that piece links to:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2672871-mike-freemans-10-point-stance-can-anyone-stop-the-pats-dont-sleep-on-dallas?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-16

 

Quote

 

2. Is Cam Newton Playing on a Level Field?

 

hi-res-4c39bc17f1543ca3215078ffd432de1c_
 
Sean Gardner/Getty Images

 

Earlier this season, I wrote about how people around the leagueas well as myselfbelieve Cam Newton is held to a quarterbacking double standard. Hits on Brady that would draw a flag aren't called on Newton.

Six team executives B/R interviewed even more recently said this is still happening. They believe game officials continue to look at Newton differently.

Newton isn't seen by game officials as a "real quarterback," as one general manager put it. Another executive said the excuse that he takes shots because he runs the ball so much—and doesn't get callscan't be used because he takes illegal hits while in the pocket.

It's important to note that some of the executives B/R spoke to don't even like Newton. But they feel his treatment is unfair and bad for the game.

"What's hurting the game now is the sense among fans that there's no single standard for anything," another team executive said.

That complaint—a lack of standardizationhas been an undercurrent of conversation among not only media and fans but also, privately, some teams as well. The varying punishments for domestic violence, the varying definitions of a catch and different applications of certain rules also rile some teams.

These executives see Newton's double standard treatment, they say, as another component of that unevenness that makes football susceptible to accusations there's no single set of rules.

But back to Newton. Is it accurate he's not being treated fairly? It's impossible to tell without looking at every hit on him and comparing those hits to ones other quarterbacks have taken. In other words, look at a low hit on Newton that wasn't called, then look at what happened with all other low hits from this season. Something like that.

But the opinion of many around the league with whom I spoke is that we're witnessing one of the league's stars get hit illegallyrepeatedly—with little deterrent.

And that's got to change.

    

3. Cam Is Right, but...

 

hi-res-ab7b7ec02944c6e1d954b365443e9c33_
 
Scott Cunningham/Getty Images

 

While some execs believe Newton has a reason to be upset about the hits he has been taking, the other sense I got in speaking to people around the sport is that Newton shouldn't be the one to express his frustration with how he is being officiated. Rather, it should be head coach Ron Rivera who takes up his quarterback's cause both privately and publicly (and he may be doing the former).

By voicing his displeasure, Newton, these league sources say, has opened a door for some players to get inside his head. How? First, they may feel emboldened to try hitting Newton a little low, or a little late. Second, unless the officials start doing their job, those opponents may feel the risk is worth it because the hit won't be called. And third, they know Newton is likely to be sensitive no matter how the hit turns out or if the flag comes.

That's why the organization needs to handle this for Newton, not Newton himself.

    

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I guess there are a poo ton of people that have forgotten that Rivera HAS talked to the League Office. He HAS sent in tape of some of the hits Cam has taken. Rivera, and Gman both talked to the LO after last week.

 

What are they supposed to do? Take out a full page add so people will know they are doing something. Some folks are in such a hurry to get their thoughts out there, that the truth gets lost in the shuffle.

 

But hey, if you want to bash Rivera, facts won't stop you. Because if you have been paying attention, you would know that Cam's support system has tried multiple times to get this issue addressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...