We have the least productive number 2 WR in the league?

[Mr. Scot]

4 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

That's why I specifically said WR, many teams also use their TE doesn't excuse our WR for lack of production 

You think a receiver who's producing less than a top tight end is underachieving?

Doubt you can back that up.

[Bartin]

3 hours ago, KillerKat said:

A name we should keep in mind is Jaelen Strong. He may be available for trade in the offseason. They already have Hopkins and Fuller with Miller up and coming. It makes sense.

Not only is Jaelen Strong terrible, but another big WR who can't separate is the last thing we need.

[Cj72]

This is really simple:

 

One of the leagues top te + kb #1 + 3 guys splitting #2 + being a running team = low production from any individual #2 receiver. 

[Mojo]

Funchess should be starting as our number 2, but he's not.  Until then he really can't be included in this argument, neither can Philly.  Ginn, well..whatever with Ginn.  He needs to be lower on the depth chart.

[uncfan888]

1 hour ago, Cj72 said:

This is really simple:

 

One of the leagues top te + kb #1 + 3 guys splitting #2 + being a running team = low production from any individual #2 receiver. 

Some people don't have the brain capacity to understand that 

[iamhubby1]

Saw a Gooby thread, and clicked to see what's up. Wasn't disappointed.

 

Cam's completing passes at about the same rate as always.

 

We pass the ball about as much as always.

 

Olsen, and KB are going to lead the team in targets just like always.

 

Every other WR is going to get looks at about the same rate as always.

 

We don't have a #2, or 3, we have a bunch of guys that play about the same as usual.

 

Funchess started against the Rams. And we have to let this play out to see what he has. He is still a kid, and he doesn't need to be a #2 yet. Just continue to get better.

 

OP says he has perused all the numbers, but doesn't bother to show any of his work.

 

How about comparing our #2, 3, and 4 against other teams?

[frash.exe]

you know i always thought it was trite to say this, but some of you ppl really do think this is fuging madden

[Khyber53]

From the stats I saw, we're 15th in the league for passing yards per game. It's actually better than I figured. Not sure there's a story here.

[TheSpecialJuan]

8 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Looking through every roster and I'm trying to find someone with less production than Ginn or Funchess. Maybe the Browns since Coleman is injured.

 

We should of signed Mike Wallace 

[PantherBuckeye89]

7 hours ago, csx said:

Olsen is our 1....most targets, most receptions, most yards.

It makes the debate about the #2 wide receiver almost pointless.

Fair enough

[uncfan888]

40 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

you know i always thought it was trite to say this, but some of you ppl really do think this is fuging madden

We should have all pros at every position.  Duh

[GoobyPls]

7 hours ago, Cj72 said:

This is really simple:

 

One of the leagues top te + kb #1 + 3 guys splitting #2 + being a running team = low production from any individual #2 receiver. 

Many teams like the Chargers or Seattle have highly producing tight ends and still have more productive receivers 

 

sooner or later people in this forum are gonna come to the realization we need to upgrade this WR core, they lost is the SB last season but if you're ok with that....

[Wundrbread33]

Funchess gets open, he just doesn't have the rapport that Benji and Olsen have with the QB's.

Hell, DA went his entire start without even looking at Funchess, who was often wide the fug open.

Funchess is just fine.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[uncfan888]

8 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Many teams like the Chargers or Seattle have highly producing tight ends and still have more productive receivers 

 

sooner or later people in this forum are gonna come to the realization we need to upgrade this WR core, they lost is the SB last season but if you're ok with that....

Last season we didn't have KB. That's a bad argument