Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Defense


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I have two areas of concern.  Oline and Dline.  I think our secondary can hold up but I'm not sure we get much of a pass rush.  Oakland's Offensive line is solid.  The name Kony Ealy only strikes fear in the heart of the nearest hotdog stand, because eating is the only thing I can imagine he's put any effort into since the superb owl.  And then there's Ryan Delaire, A.K.A "Flash in The Pan" that runs himself completely out of the play or spends his time laying on the ground acting like he's making snow angels.  Cam is gonna do his best to win this game on offense even with this patchwork Oline that is as porous as a collander.  If we win, it will be on Cam's shoulders.  I'll go with the optimistic 27-24, but not because of our defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh the slow starts hurt more than anything, it took 6-8 weeks to start gelling. Offensively, the Oline is the biggest problem. Cam just doesn't have time. It's all on the defense, and they realized it and stepped up. Now if Shula will just call plays to help Cam out.

 

 

 

oh yeah. Gettledouche something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TarHeel69 said:

I have two areas of concern.  Oline and Dline.  I think our secondary can hold up but I'm not sure we get much of a pass rush.  Oakland's Offensive line is solid.  The name Kony Ealy only strikes fear in the heart of the nearest hotdog stand, because eating is the only thing I can imagine he's put any effort into since the superb owl.  And then there's Ryan Delaire, A.K.A "Flash in The Pan" that runs himself completely out of the play or spends his time laying on the ground acting like he's making snow angels.  Cam is gonna do his best to win this game on offense even with this patchwork Oline that is as porous as a collander.  If we win, it will be on Cam's shoulders.  I'll go with the optimistic 27-24, but not because of our defense.

We need to get more physical on both fronts period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the offense can put up 20 points and shut out the opponent through 3 quarters, they will always keep it close.

Does a defense that must not give up a TD in the first 3 quarters to have a shot at winning in the 4th quarter give you hope?

The Panthers have given up 44 points in the 4th quarter in the past 3 games. Does that give you hope?

The Panthers need to be happy they have 4 wins in 10 weeks with the way their defense implodes on itself in the 2nd half, and definitely collapses in the 4th quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

As long as the offense can put up 20 points and shut out the opponent through 3 quarters, they will always keep it close.

Does a defense that must not give up a TD in the first 3 quarters to have a shot at winning in the 4th quarter give you hope?

The Panthers have given up 44 points in the 4th quarter in the past 3 games. Does that give you hope?

The Panthers need to be happy they have 4 wins in 10 weeks with the way their defense implodes on itself in the 2nd half, and definitely collapses in the 4th quarter.

 

The Panthers have won 3 of their last 4. Does that give you hope?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

The Panthers have won 3 of their last 4. Does that give you hope?

I love this team, I'll never root for us to lose for draft picks like some fans, with the exception of 2010(sorry).....

But, no, I have little hope. The Chiefs loss ripped my football heart out because we were building momentum, dominated them for three quarters, and then proceeded to sh*t the bed 2011-2012 style.

Why do I have such little hope? Injuries, our offense is only good for one half, and for as good as our defense has been over the years with McDermott we have had one consistent problem that nobody talks about. We are not a "closeout" defense. A lot of games we win come down to hanging on for dear life. And that's the lack of a consistent pass rush since Hardy leaving and lacking the impact Safety this defense needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PantherBuckeye89 said:

I love this team, I'll never root for us to lose for draft picks like some fans, with the exception of 2010(sorry).....

But, no, I have little hope. The Chiefs loss ripped my football heart out because we were building momentum, dominated them for three quarters, and then proceeded to sh*t the bed 2011-2012 style.

Why do I have such little hope? Injuries, our offense is only good for one half, and for as good as our defense has been over the years with McDermott we have had one consistent problem that nobody talks about. We are not a "closeout" defense. A lot of games we win come down to hanging on for dear life. And that's the lack of a consistent pass rush since Hardy leaving and lacking the impact Safety this defense needs. See, ya'll want to talk about CB. Nah, watch the scheme closely and join me in crying out for a stud at Safety. Coleman is fine....as a centerfielding FS. But I'd kill for Jamal Adams in the 2017 draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quoted rom one of the many Bryce threads... Wanted to reply to this, but since my answer turned into a go route (i.e. went long) I thought I'd put it in a separate thread. So here's my take on the names mentioned above (and others) ... Lance was a prototypical "take an athlete and teach him to play quarterback" example who now serves as an example of why that's a bad idea. Worth remembering that Lance was given to a coach heralded as a QB guru with a friendly system. In the end though, even that potentially ideal situation wasn't enough. And the fact those events were followed up by said guru taking his team to the Super Bowl with a QB who went undrafted helps bolster the folly.of that approach. But then you have Wilson, an actual quarterback with off the charts passing skill. This guy's sure to succeed, right? Well...wrong, which demonstrates that even the right skill set doesn't guarantee success.  Could Wilson have succeeded in a better situation under better coaching? Unknown, but it's a question I find myself asking a lot. (See also: Levis, Will) Rosen falls into the Ryan Leaf / Ryan Mallet category, i.e. don't hand the keys to your billion dollar franchise over to a dickhead. Character matters, and not strictly in the 'upright citizen vs thuggish criminal ' way. (I could add maybe don't draft guys with the first name 'Ryan' unless they went to Harvard, and even then only in the 7th round) Darnold is another guy who likely could have benefited from a better situation / coaching (see also Carr: David). Heck, it also might have helped to send him to The Wizard and have him ask for "da noiv", or perhaps to Egon Spengler and company to chase away any and all "ghosts". Sending him to Matt Rhule? 😬 Yeah...definitely not the answer 😕 But hey, at least he's doing better now. (ttill playoff time, anyway) Mind you, Drew Brees does serve as proof that guys who land in less than ideal - or just flat out lousy - situations early on can indeed resurrect their careers later on in better surroundings. Will Darnold go that far? Unknown, but we do know it's possible. Kenny Pickett (also known by the X-Men moniker 'Littlehand') is that proverbial great college quarterback who for one reason or another just doesn't cut it in the pros.  (gotta say, feels like the past several drafts have put forth a lot of that particular QB archetype) Mac Jones could arguably carry this label as well, though I'm waiting to see how things play out in San Francisco. For now, Jones might be a better example of why you should always be cautious and skeptical of guys from certain systems. Justin Fields is a cell in that spreadsheet column, as is Kyler Murray. Now I'm sure someone here will mention another certain quarterback we're all quite familiar with as a prime example of this subset too 😐 Fair point, though I think he, Murray and Tagovailoa work better under the heading of "Davids". What's a David? It's a guy you send to battle against a "Goliath". And by all means, bet on that guy if he's a shepherd.  If he's a quarterback, though? 🤔 Root for him, encourage him, appreciate his courage and be inspired by him... ...but don't draft him. The return on investment might be a great story, but it's not likely to be one that involves championships and rings. ... Bottom Line? You've no doubt heard this saying "this ain't rocket science".  Well, I'd argue saying "this ain't quarterback evaluation" might truly make a better negative metaphorical comparison. At least with rocket science, it's science. You're working with things that have some level of consistency, even predictability. Stuff like chemistry, physics, metallurgy, etc. Human beings?  Specifically young male athletes with massive amounts of ego and testosterone who've been heavily catered to a lot of their lives and have now been handed large sums money and a portal to fame... Yeah, good luck with thatb😖 Heck, you might get better odds buying a Powerball ticket, or perhaps playing a roulette wheel at a Vegas casino. (gambling involves risk; please play responsibility. for help with gambling addiction call the Gambling Hotline at 1-800-522-4700)
    • The sad part is Williams led the league in rushing tds as well with like 18 and didn't even make the pro bowl that season.  Too bad it all ended in Jake's epic collapse 
    • Yeah. He talked about using him that way and I forget the term. Maybe nickel LB? Ike have to watch it again.    If you look at the video it is maybe 2/3 through where talks about him and also CSW.     
×
×
  • Create New...