Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron is not getting fired


SCP

Recommended Posts

If we win two more games Rivera will have an almost identical record after six seasons that Johnny Fox had.  (Counting playoffs) 56-45 vs 56-47.  Of course we probably dont even win two more.  I swear this year has been a fuging nightmare.  

I think Rivera gets another year but change must be mandated.  We need new thinking at the OC position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCP said:

I just don't see Jerry paying Ron not to be here even if he loses this team.

 

Losing teams don't make money.

I do believe Gettleman has the authority to fire Rivera if he wants to. Said it before: if he can cut Steve Smith, he can fire Ron Rivera.

My question is whether or not he's willing to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, countryboi said:

he not going to get fired but someone is going to have to fall on this sword....it will most likely be Shula, even though he does not share all of the blame. 

I'm not convinced Rivera would be willing to fire Shula.

If he's not, and higher ups want him gone, then things get dicey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SCP said:

 


I just don't see Jerry paying Ron not to be here even if he loses this team.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

JR should calculate the losses in ads and merchandise sales if Ron stays. It might be less expensive to pay for two HC than accepting less revenue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Losing teams don't make money.

I do believe Gettleman has the authority to fire Rivera if he wants to. Said it before: if he can cut Steve Smith, he can fire Ron Rivera.

My question is whether or not he's willing to do so.

I think like 90% of what a team makes in the NFL is profit sharing anyway.   The owners don't care too much unless it's personal reasons.  They'll always make money.  The Browns are making money.    They do take in the concession money, but Charlotte will sell seats for fans of other teams always, so it's not a big concern.     The only thing I ever had hope for was Richardson may want a title before he dies, but with these coach hirings, I'm not so sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...