Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Zimmer apologized to the Vikings players for not leading them to where they need to go


beastson

Recommended Posts

Of course Ron didn't say that, because ITS NOT HIS FAULT!!!

And of course Dave won't shoulder any of the blame... because ITS NOT HIS FAULT!!!

The failures of this season fall squarely on the players... nobody else. 

I know this because Ron and Dave NEVER accept responsibility for their fug ups

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, beastson said:

Fox post game locker room just showed a little of his speech. He didn't make injury excuses. He stood there like a man and blamed himself and was holding back tears. You think Ron did that? fug no

I bet my life savings Ron has not and will not do that. This is all due to injuries and players only, in Rivera's head. If it helps him sleep at night then sweet dreams. But then you have Shula who knows a lot of failures this season comes from bad coaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera's version: "It's very unfortunate that we had all the injuries that we had this year. And you know, if the ball bounces our way a few times, we would be right in the thick of things, and I really believe that Joe. We have a great group of guys in there and we were just unlucky this year".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rhyslloyd said:

According to themselves, these coaches have made no mistakes. They don't hold themselves accountable and neither does ownership. It's why a culture of mediocrity has been created and tolerated here.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Thank you!! I said months ago that management/ownership was okay with mediocracy and some people got their panties in a bunch, but it's true. Richardson is okay with it, Gettleman is okay with it, and Ron is as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...