Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Line 17th per PFF


top dawg

Recommended Posts

17. Carolina Panthers (6)

Top overall grade: LG Andrew Norwell, 85.7 (No. 11)

Top pass-blocking grade: LG Andrew Norwell, 85.2 (No. 14)

Top run-blocking grade: LG Andrew Norwell, 84.8 (No. 4)

The loss of Michael Oher doesn’t seem like a huge deal until you consider that it puts Mike Remmers at left tackle, where he was simply out of his depth. Remmers gave up nine sacks and 49 total QB pressures this season, and was also flagged 15 times. Remmers’ move also opened up another problem position at right tackle. Daryl Williams wasn’t able to make that spot his own, and RG Trai Turner struggled badly when he was moved out there for three games late in the season. Turner’s season was a huge drop in quality from 2015; he was flagged four times more than last year, surrendering twice the number of sacks and 19 additional QB pressures, while not having nearly the same impact as a run blocker. This is a team that needs an injection of talent at the tackle position, but just getting everybody back in their regular positions likely will help significantly.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-offensive-lines-this-season/

 

Coming from the 6th spot is quite a tumble indeed, but you'd think that we were bottom feeders of the league this past season the way that some fans talk. I think that it's fair to ask if the downturn of the O-line is commensurate with the fall of the offense in general (down to 15th, I believe) and individual players whose stats also were negatively impacted to varying degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Injuries were the killer for us over the long haul. Kalil and Oher going out were major blows and Remmers can be a very serviceable right tackle but he struggled on the left side. Of course, it's never just a simple flip from one side of the line to the other... you've got a different job on each play from before and you are generally facing a completely different style of edge rusher.  Combine that with the loss of Kalil's protection calls at the line and he struggled, but with good reason. It shows that Oher really was a find for us. Neither of those two are bound for Canton, but they are better in their regular position than average.

The sad part of it was we had a lot of hope that Williams would come in and just wow us. He... just didn't. And Turner is really a great find at guard, but tackle is too much.

I'd say we need help at the tackle position, but the truth is, every team needs tackles. They aren't skilling up the ones at the college level to meet the needs of NFL teams and the position is really hard to play well AND stay uninjured in. Big guys who are light on their feet, but can maul opponents and play every down and learn an entire playbook just don't grow on trees.

I still think, even without major changes, that we'll be better next year if everyone can come back healthy. There's a lot more experience along the line than there was before and we got to see a couple of good back ups get some time on the field. We may have also found our eventual replacement for Kalil (and let's hope Ryan can stick with us for 5 or 6 more years.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

 

The sad part of it was we had a lot of hope that Williams would come in and just wow us. He... just didn't. And Turner is really a great find at guard, but tackle is too much.

 

 

Williams barely played much at all. He did real well from the games I saw. 

At the very least, he's an upgrade over Remmers. He shut out Beasley 2 games in a row, unlike Remmers.

Once the o-line got some stability with Larsen at center, Daryl Williams and Trai Turner showed up as of late. Even PFF agreed with that part. 

But really just got to wait it out. I think Daryl Williams is still the future until he proves otherwise. He's shown great flashes these past few games, and he's better than Remmers at everything.

Just need a healthy line period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

Coming from the 6th spot is quite a tumble indeed, but you'd think that we were bottom feeders of the league this past season the way that some fans talk. I think that it's fair to ask if the downtown of the O-line is commensurate with the fall of the offense in general (down to 15th, I believe) and individual players whose stats also were negatively impacted to varying degrees.

Sounds like you put weight in PFF.  Nobody is going to dupe me into believing we were in the top 28 or so OLs in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Sounds like you put weight in PFF.  Nobody is going to dupe me into believing we were in the top 28 or so OLs in the league. 

Lol. If Cam had the Broncos O-line...

We'd be contemplating whether Cam retires immediately. Believe it or not we just have mediocre tackles, not bad.

This offense requires good tackles though, which is why the situation seems worse than it really is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Sounds like you put weight in PFF.  Nobody is going to dupe me into believing we were in the top 28 or so OLs in the league. 

Nothing is perfect, and probably can't be considering all of the dynamics that go into judging a player and a football team, but for all the flack PFF gets, it is arguably the best grading system out there. Mind you, I didn't say perfect or all-inclusive, but a pretty good reference.

As for our line, I've seen worse this year. Some of the teams we played had worse, and PFF's rankings reflect that. There are probably multiple posters on multiple football message boards across the Internet who are saying something similar to you about their team's O-line. The notion that "Our team has the worst O-line in the league," is not unique to the Panthers, or even a rare occurrence in general.

The fact is, we had a middle-of-the-pack O-line, and should have had at least a middle-of-the-pack type of result. Injuries, play calling, lack of imagination, lack of execution, inexperience, and a generally uninspired effort caused us to fall even further than we should have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Williams barely played much at all. He did real well from the games I saw. 

At the very least, he's an upgrade over Remmers. He shut out Beasley 2 games in a row, unlike Remmers.

Once the o-line got some stability with Larsen at center, Daryl Williams and Trai Turner showed up as of late. Even PFF agreed with that part. 

But really just got to wait it out. I think Daryl Williams is still the future until he proves otherwise. He's shown great flashes these past few games, and he's better than Remmers at everything.

Just need a healthy line period.

Your last sentence is probably the biggest truth when it comes to a successful offensive line. If they stay healthy, they can be good. Almost every o-line starts to crumble at the first injury, by the second it becomes a disaster. Even Dallas' much-vaunted O-line would be hard pressed to lose two members and still be able to protect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's obvious that the top priority needs to be the o-line. Either bring in top o-line free agents, or take the best the draft has to offer. Enough with wasted defensive picks that have minimal impact on the game. This is a passing league and the rules favor the receivers. Cam wants to go over the top of the defense with his throws, so the o-line needs to be premium. We need to be scoring in the 30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact we were that high is a bit impressive.  People seem to devalue the effect of injuries.  I know every team deals with some injuries but ours were abnormally high.

At certain points this year we had a 2nd or 3rd string LT, 2nd or 3rd string center, 2nd string RG,  and 2nd or 3rd string RT.  Often times we had those backups playing at the same time.  There aren't many teams in the league who survive that.

By no means am I saying we shouldn't look for upgrades but if the line gets healthy we aren't near as bad as some on here think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused how us not protecting Cam Newton is the 'problem' meanwhile literally the worst offensive line in the league (Seattle) according to PFF won 10 games and received a 1st round bye this year. It's almost like they know how to disguise their weaknesses and win despite of them while we are using our weaknesses as an excuse to be bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...