Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SS Jamal Adams - Good Film Study


Saca312

Recommended Posts

SS Jamal Adams is getting a ton of hype. Many here consider him - including me -  an absolute must-grab if available with the #8 pick. He would immediately solidify a position of necessity (SS) and provide immediate impact and leadership to go along with our ball-hawking Kurt Coleman when he's moved to his natural FS position.

As I was searching around for some good information concerning draft picks, I came across this beauty:

Certainly never heard of this commentator/youtuber before, but he provides some very good insight into Jamal Adams and what he brings to the table.

If him and Fournette are available at the same time, that'd certainly be a tough choice. But, after thinking, I believe we could find immediate value in the later rounds at runningback, and come out with a solid day one starter in Adams if he's available. 

I certainly want him after watching this. 

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

You get the sense Gettleman is looking at Safety and realizing Boston isn't a starter and is looking for one in round 1 or 2. I honestly think Adams, Hooker or Obi would be great though Adams and Obi seem more logical.

Gettleman has remarked on this safety class in his presser a while back.

I can assure you Boston is not a true starter at FS. Coleman can't play SS.

We'll likely look for a fix this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

You get the sense Gettleman is looking at Safety and realizing Boston isn't a starter and is looking for one in round 1 or 2. I honestly think Adams, Hooker or Obi would be great though Adams and Obi seem more logical.

Let's not hype Obi like he's even close to the player Hooker is (not sure if that's what you were doing). I can see why you could say Obi is more logical but he's going to take far more time to develop and adjust to the NFL than Hooker is. Let's not forget that Hooker takes the ball away; something Wilks, Rivera, and Gettleman put a premium on. I don't think Coleman being on the roster really changes the Adams vs. Hooker debate. If Malik is higher on their board than Jamal I think they will draft Malik. Adams and Hooker are both elite safety prospects and if either was the pick, I would love it. I'm not totally sure either will be on the board at 8 in which case another elite prospect will likely be on the board. Right now my realistic top 4 at 8 is something like below with a big gap between Hooker and Thomas. If we knock our first 3 picks out of the park this team is right back where it needs to be assuming free agency fills holes  

1. Adams 2. Fournette 3. Hooker 4. Solomon Thomas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not hype Obi like he's even close to the player Hooker is. I'm not sure if that's what you're doing but Adams and Hooker are both elite safety prospects and if either was the pick, I would love it. I'm not totally sure either will be on the board at 8 in which case another elite prospect will likely be on the board. Right now my realistic top 4 at 8 is something like below with a big gap between Hooker and Thomas. If we knock our first 3 picks out of the park this team is right back where it needs to be assuming free agency fills holes  

1. Adams 2. Fournette 3. Hooker 4. Solomon Thomas 

1-3 looks solid, although I'd flip LF and MH but that's just personal pref. I'd love any of them. Don't get the Solomon Thomas hype at all for us. Like Taco Charlton better as a fit for CAR tbh

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, we need a SS that has both Leadership, and Communication skills. Let me explain. To be a true leader you need to be able to take charge Cerebrally, and Physically. By setting the example off the field during class, or workouts. Or on the field during games, or practice. Can he be that lead by example guy? And can he make his mates better?

 

And can he communicate at game speed? Is he able to not only line you up right, but can he keep you on track during the play. Because to me, that is what makes a great SS. His ability to talk through a play. That ability to not only analyze  a play, but to communicate while doing so.

 

That is a SS that can lead your backfield. Now is that guy a FA? One that can cost you some money, but will take control right away. Or is he a rook? And the inevitable growing pains that come with him? Most coaches would probably go with the former. Well, because their job is to win I suppose. But if you get the right rook. He can set you up  for some long term success.

 

Me? Because we have some money, I would go the FA route. I just feel that position merits the attention.

 

Just one more in the semi long line of decisions Gman, and Ron have to make here in the near future.

 

Oh, and just an FYI. We already have a FS that, over the last two years, has played at an All Pro level. So we don't really need to invest any resources into another FS. Let's get us that SS that can lead us back to glory shall we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Gettleman has remarked on this safety class in his presser a while back.

I can assure you Boston is not a true starter at FS. Coleman can't play SS.

We'll likely look for a fix this offseason.

Gettleman will either draft one in mid rounds or bring in via FA . 

The sense I'm getting from the organization is that it's going to be offenseive pick. Secondary is going to improve with experience and having Wilks call the defensive plays will better utilize their talent unlike McD playing soft 

Fournette  > Adams it's not even close 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OnlyPantherFaninMaine said:

Let's not hype Obi like he's even close to the player Hooker is (not sure if that's what you were doing). I can see why you could say Obi is more logical but he's going to take far more time to develop and adjust to the NFL than Hooker is. Let's not forget that Hooker takes the ball away; something Wilks, Rivera, and Gettleman put a premium on. I don't think Coleman being on the roster really changes the Adams vs. Hooker debate. If Malik is higher on their board than Jamal I think they will draft Malik. Adams and Hooker are both elite safety prospects and if either was the pick, I would love it. I'm not totally sure either will be on the board at 8 in which case another elite prospect will likely be on the board. Right now my realistic top 4 at 8 is something like below with a big gap between Hooker and Thomas. If we knock our first 3 picks out of the park this team is right back where it needs to be assuming free agency fills holes  

1. Adams 2. Fournette 3. Hooker 4. Solomon Thomas 

Obi in the 2nd is what I mean, Adams and Hooker would be great choices in the 1st. I think it's easy for us on the Huddle to want a SS over Hooker just because we want the quickest route to a Super Bowl. That being said a SS would immediately improve this defense while Coleman could move back to FS. The problem is I think Coleman is at best an above average FS even with all those picks, which are misleading. Truth is Hooker, while he struggles in the the tackling Dept, is truly an elite center field FS that can shut down deep routes with speed and instincts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...