Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Jaguars have filled all their needs except...


Verge

Recommended Posts

Bad news for those wanting to draft Fournette, the possible picks for the Jaguars came down to Adams (church), pass rusher (Campbell), Lattimore (Bouye), Hooker,and Fournette.

 

I know a lot of us were hoping to nab him, so this would suck, but unless they get cheeky with d-line, target ANOTHER db, or reeaaallly early OL, we are out of luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea , I'm in the wait and see on the Draft , I hope 1 of the 2  Fournette or Adams  are still on the board at #8 , But you never know who will be on the board when our pick comes up.

Now its Time to fill  My breakfast needs  hahah  7 eggs  mixed with 1/2 cup of oats and ham  , side cup of black beans and 2 16oz bottle of water  YUMMY YUMMY

 

Mock Draft Report 5.0: Post-Combine

170308_mock_inside.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They released Sen'Derrick Marks, DT yesterday, and Campbell is 30 years old.  Ivory (2021), and Yeldon are under contract for multiple years.  Nothing cheeky about it, their DL still sucks.  Allen or Thomas are still the LIKELY pick(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NcPsa10 said:

Yea , I'm in the wait and see on the Draft , I hope 1 of the 2  Fournette or Adams  are still on the board at #8 , But you never know who will be on the board when our pick comes up.

Now its Time to fill  My breakfast needs  hahah  7 eggs  mixed with 1/2 cup of oats and ham  , side cup of black beans and 2 16oz bottle of water  YUMMY YUMMY

The chances Fournette or Adams are on the board is H I G H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steves89 said:

Doesn't this make the likelihood of a safety being on the board higher? Adams is the number one person on my board (well, after myles) and Hooker, though not my favorite wouldn't be bad at 8 either.

Maybe Hooker but I doubt it.  Not Adams with Church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Verge said:

Bad news for those wanting to draft Fournette, the possible picks for the Jaguars came down to Adams (church), pass rusher (Campbell), Lattimore (Bouye), Hooker,and Fournette.

 

I know a lot of us were hoping to nab him, so this would suck, but unless they get cheeky with d-line, target ANOTHER db, or reeaaallly early OL, we are out of luck. 

Maybe. There is an argument that they don't need a RB. But, with Coughlin running the place, I am sure Fournette is a big bleep on the radar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Maybe. There is an argument that they don't need a RB. But, with Coughlin running the place, I am sure Fournette is a big bleep on the radar.

So are Allen/Thomas.  Just sucks we have to wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know everything about Jacksonville at all.  It really depends on how they view certain players, and how they fit into their plans.

Fournette needs a power running team, which it looks like Jacksonville has.  Do they feel like he's a better player over what they have?  Do they have a bigger hole on their roster?  Jacksonville has been the team of potential, tons of high draft picks, and chronic under achievement. Why is that?

Who knows who they will pick, or who will trade up.  We know that this draft is already getting crazy with the rest of the trades going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...