Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Kickoff Rule Proposed by Redskins.


ichigo1057

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Jangler said:

With the help of the networks, they can place two rings on the sides of the goal posts. One is worth 25 points, the other, a C list actor is put to death. Of course that list will be have to be kept up to date. And from time to time, might have to reach up to the B actors. Yeah, I'm looking at you David Giuntoli.

What about D Squad commentators? I'm looking at you Sam Rosen and David Diehl!

 

edit: Fuggin Brian Baldinger. Yea, please, tell me how every fuging guy on the field that has dreads is chris gamble you fuging mouth-breathing, fat-fingered, dick wizard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I hope they pass this.  It is actually a really cool idea.  In a game where every yard matters, not only does it reward you for putting your all into each and every kicmoff, it adds fan interest in what has become an extremely uninteresting play.  Instead of shrugging off a useless play, we will now be interested in whether or not they can get it through the uprights.

Furthermore, it will also increase interest for stat geeks.

@KB_fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I hope they pass this.  It is actually a really cool idea.  In a game where every yard matters, not only does it reward you for putting your all into each and every kicmoff, it adds fan interest in what has become an extremely uninteresting play.  Instead of shrugging off a useless play, we will now be interested in whether or not they can get it through the uprights.

Furthermore, it will also increase interest for stat geeks.

We saw how useful kickoffs can be in the Super Bowl. The play doesn't have to benefit one team more than the other; it's all a matter of who is most intelligent in preparing for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb and pointless.

 

They're hoping it will pass so as to discourage teams willfully kicking the ball short of the goal line and winning the field position battle that way as they did last year, but it won't.

 

The statistical odds don't back it up, and teams will process as they did last year.

 

All except us in our refusal to admit Graham is no longer useful on kickoffs and teams will continue to start us at the 15 while we keep awarding them a free 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/27/2017 at 3:53 AM, Proudiddy said:

Furthermore, it will also increase interest for stat geeks.

LOL.  Yup.  But dang I no longer have time to track even the major stats...  Really hoping something changes and my schedule allows me renewed time / energy for number crunching.   All the stuff I've done for work in Excel recently is SO B-O-R-I-N-G!!!  I'd love a break to crunch some NFL & Panthers data!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mike Davis is like yeah, why would these coaches expect me to watch film on our next opponent if I'm playing good.  Yeah, I really don't pay attention to a lot of stuff around me if I'm doing good.   also Mike Davis, how dare they give all the reps to CMC.  from just listening to that interview, I think Mike Davis likely was often in Mike Davis' way and he can't comprehend that aspect.  Even his story of why he hated people.....was weird.  He hated Steve Spurrier because Spurrier was like hey Mike, Marcus Lattimore left...and we need you to step up into that role/void and be more for us.   And Mike Davis was like, can you believe that motha trucka!! Nah Steve.  Just give me the ball and leave me alone (paraphrasing it all obviously but that was the gist). 
    • Unless he's 1,000%, just sit him an extra week at this point to let him get his legs back under him. I want to see him out there as much as the next guy, but this was a serious thing and I'd rather wait an extra week than put him out one day too early and risk something going wrong, play the long game for once.
    • God, these posts are really starting to piss me off If we're relying on Moore, Idzik, and Canales to carry that weight, then we're royally screwing over our young WR room.  It's not that those guys can't help with some of it, but these young promising WRs are going to miss out on a lot of learning that can only be provided by the vets on the team.   You do realize that coaches spend ZERO time in the locker room, right?   They are only in there just before games and at halftime, but the rest of the week, they have their own locker room, they only spend time with the players on the field and in the film room.  There is soooooo much time that you're leaving unaccounted for where players are working together to get better. Players are constantly talking about their game and how they can improve while they're in the locker room.  If you think career long special teamer David Moore is going to be able to carry that water in the locker room, then you're sorely and woefully mistaken. Even beyond that, if a coach pulls a player aside to give advice between series, that still means there are 4-5 other WRs who aren't getting individual advice, where that's normally a time a vet like Thielen is going over with them what he's seeing out there and how they can do X, Y, or Z to do A, B, or C better on the next drive.
×
×
  • Create New...