Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Payton "playing up" Ginn. The truth is out there...


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I'm going to be honest. I was somewhat shocked to see Ted Ginn Jr.'s name in a headline at NFL.com. I mean the story's over. They signed him a long time ago. Why in the world is he being mentioned? It's kind of humorous to me to be honest.

Not that I really "care" about what the Saints are doing (because frankly I believe we're top-to-bottom better, even if they do get Mixon @nctarheel0619), but I suppose Ginn was brought in to replace Cooks.

"The Saints traded in Brandin Cooks for an older, supposedly tougher model this offseason, and Saints head coach Sean Payton is just fine with that.

"'I made this comment: I think this guy has played better in the middle to the back half of his career than the front,' Payton said of Ted Ginn this week at the NFL Annual Meeting (via ESPN.com). 'I do think he's got punt-return value. There's a level of toughness that comes with him that I like. And he's still, when he's playing in each game, the fastest player on the field.'"

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000796649/article/sean-payton-has-exact-vision-for-how-to-use-ted-ginn

And Conor Orr alludes to the fact that Payton is using more than coach-speak.

"While talking up a new acquisition is part of the offseason routine, Payton does seem especially smitten with the boom-or-bust wide receiver, who has never had a 1,000-yard season in his 10-year career (Cooks had two in his first three seasons). Because a young first-round pick was part of the deal, he has to be."

So, I guess Payton is doing a number on himself by talking up Ginn, the same player whom Dave Gettleman and company---and many Huddlers, myself included---didn't think merited the money that Ginn apparently wanted, particularly in light of Ginn's arguably limited skill set. Personally, I just think that we can get a better receiver at a relative fraction of even that relatively low price.

But you know, Payton is apparently envisioning Ginn playing a more important role. Payton is not only happy about that but gets a double bonus since he believes that he "stole" Ginn from his division rival according to Orr. I doubt that Bruce Arians was as "giddy" or at least tongue-in-cheek when he acquired Ginn, and we all know how that turned out.

I guess we'll see this coming season. Maybe everyone will turn out happy. I'm pretty sure the Panthers won't be losing any sleep. I kind of feel like Payton is gonna have some buyer's remorse once Ginn leaves some key catches on the ground and doesn't prove to be quite as capable as Cooks. And, I'm not gonna lie, that makes me grin. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm going to be honest. I was somewhat shocked to see Ted Ginn Jr.'s name in a headline at NFL.com. I mean the story's over. They signed him a long time ago. Why in the world is he being mentioned? It's kind of humorous to me to be honest.

Not that I really "care" about what the Saints are doing (because frankly I believe we're top-to-bottom better, even if they do get Mixon @nctarheel0619), but I suppose Ginn was brought in to replace Cooks.

"The Saints traded in Brandin Cooks for an older, supposedly tougher model this offseason, and Saints head coach Sean Payton is just fine with that.

"'I made this comment: I think this guy has played better in the middle to the back half of his career than the front,' Payton said of Ted Ginn this week at the NFL Annual Meeting (via ESPN.com). 'I do think he's got punt-return value. There's a level of toughness that comes with him that I like. And he's still, when he's playing in each game, the fastest player on the field.'"

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000796649/article/sean-payton-has-exact-vision-for-how-to-use-ted-ginn

And Conor Orr alludes to the fact that Payton is using more than coach-speak.

"While talking up a new acquisition is part of the offseason routine, Payton does seem especially smitten with the boom-or-bust wide receiver, who has never had a 1,000-yard season in his 10-year career (Cooks had two in his first three seasons). Because a young first-round pick was part of the deal, he has to be."

So, I guess Payton is doing a number on himself by talking up Ginn, the same player whom Dave Gettleman and company---and many Huddlers, myself included---didn't think merited the money that Ginn apparently wanted, particularly in light of Ginn's arguably limited skill set. Personally, I just think that we can get a better receiver at a relative fraction of even that relatively low price.

But you know, Payton is apparently envisioning Ginn playing a more important role. Payton is not only happy about that but gets a double bonus since he believes that he "stole" Ginn from his division rival according to Orr. I doubt that Bruce Arians was as "giddy" or at least tongue-in-cheek when he acquired Ginn, and we all know how that turned out.

I guess we'll see this coming season. Maybe everyone will turn out happy. I'm pretty sure the Panthers won't be losing any sleep. I kind of feel like Payton is gonna have some buyer's remorse once Ginn leaves some key catches on the ground and doesn't prove to be quite as capable as Cooks. And, I'm not gonna lie, that makes me grin. 

 

Quite as capable as Cooks?  You're being kind.  Not even remotely CLOSE to being as capable as Cooks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1000 yards seasons are overrated since fans will make a huge distinction between 990 yards and 1010 yards. I realize Ginn hasn't done either. However 10 td seasons are not overrated and neither is speed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mjligon said:

Shocked he didn't say "Ginn is extremely inconsistent and we regret this move immensely."

Yeah, but I never thought I'd see an article where anyone would think that they "stole" Ginn from anyone.

Sure, I get your point, but Ginn ain't the next best thing since sliced bread. 

I'm almost laughing now. Bet you I'll be laughing in October, but maybe I'll be crying (though I seriously doubt it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Yeah, but I never thought I'd see an article where anyone would think that they "stole" Ginn from anyone.

Sure, I get your point, but Ginn ain't the next best thing since sliced bread. 

I'm almost laughing now. Bet you I'll be laughing in October, but maybe I'll be crying (though I seriously doubt it).

Nah you won't be crying lol. We know how this story plays out. Seen it before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn's biggest asset on the field is his ability to stretch the field and take the top off the defense. A big armed QB like Cam can take full advantage of that. Noodle armed Brees?

This is exactly why the Saints signing Brees surprised me. He just doesn't seem like a good fit for what they do. Guess we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...