Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: RB Adrian Peterson Willing To Play For $5 Million Or Less; Plans To Wait Until After Draft Before Exploring + Juicy Draft Info


Saca312

Recommended Posts

For those of you hoping that we get the "next Adrian Peterson" this draft class, there may be a chance we could afford the real one.

According to the MMQB, Adrian Peterson is willing to play "for the right team" at "$5 million or less." A pretty decent deal for a RB looking to prove he still has some tread left on his tires.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/dan-rooney-dean-blandino-nfl-draft-peter-king-041717

Quote

2. Adrian Peterson might wait (or have to wait) till after the draft to sign.But the good sign, I hear, is that he’s willing to play for a reasonable sum for a 32-year-old back with two washout seasons in the past three years. I hear in the right situation he would be willing to play for $5 million or less. He’s had a few visits, the most recent of which was New Orleans, which could hold some fascination because of the proximity to Peterson’s Houston home, and because Sean Payton would know well how to use him. But right now, I’m told there’s no leader in the clubhouse. After the draft is smarter for him and for teams, because that’s when teams can see most clearly their needs.

And now for some juicy draft "rumors"

Teams that seek to trade down:

Quote

6. Teams that want to trade down. San Francisco (two), Chicago (three) and the Jets (six) are the ones I hear are most antsy to move back in a market with few teams wanting to move up.

9. The second pick is a fascinating, and a bit unfortunate, spot. So the book out there is that there’s Garrett, and then there’s about 15 other players who could be number two on 32 draft boards. But that doesn’t necessarily mean new San Francisco GM John Lynch won’t have a strong market for the pick, because if a team loves, say, Trubisky and feels it must get him, the Niners will be able to move down even if the return isn’t as lucrative as a traditional trade-down from that slot.

Fournette stock isn't as high as stated?

Quote

8. Leonard Fournette is not Ezekiel Elliott. Some durability concerns with Fournette, and there’s lots of different opinions about which back goes first, and which sinks like a stone.

So there you have it. Some nice speculation to make you wish draft day was finally here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

For those of you hoping that we get the "next Adrian Peterson" this draft class, there may be a chance we could afford the real one.

According to the MMQB, Adrian Peterson is willing to play "for the right team" at "$5 million or less." A pretty decent deal for a RB looking to prove he still has some tread left on his tires.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/dan-rooney-dean-blandino-nfl-draft-peter-king-041717

And now for some juicy draft "rumors"

Teams that seek to trade down:

Fournette stock isn't as high as stated?

So there you have it. Some nice speculation to make you wish draft day was finally here. 

I predict 2 QBs will be taken in top 10 , This will push Fournette down to 8, & allow us to move up again to grab either McCaffrey or OJ Howard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys, we're taking mccaffrey and some dumb motherfuging teams are trying to take him from us because out of any team who lands in the top 10, our rivals can't stand to see us land a stud weapon to reload with. they know if we get a legit weapon to help Cam we'll be back to dominating even better than before. all we can do is sit back and patiently wait for the longest 7 picks to come in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

I wouldn't be surprised at all if Gettleman found a way to get both Fournette and McCaffrey somehow. Use them as a 1-2 punch once Stew is gone. CAP and Fozzy get cut in this situation.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

that might be the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Would be the happiest person ever if we got both without giving up too much though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ship said:

guys, we're taking mccaffrey and some dumb motherfuging teams are trying to take him from us because out of any team who lands in the top 10, our rivals can't stand to see us land a stud weapon to reload with. they know if we get a legit weapon to help Cam we'll be back to dominating even better than before. all we can do is sit back and patiently wait for the longest 7 picks to come in.

Facts. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predict 2 QBs will be taken in top 10 , This will push Fournette down to 8, & allow us to move up again to grab either McCaffrey or OJ Howard 

I wouldn't be shocked if the Patriots traded their backup QB along with a couple picks to move up in the top 6 and pick Trubiskey.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...